03-01-2007, 02:41 PM
03-01-2007, 02:47 PM
Sorry.
Didn't make it past the second paragraph:
"For many years you have been defeated by the "beast". It had a fight with you and it overcame you, because it was meant to be this way, for the fulfillment of what was written (Rev. 11:7). Following the death of our beloved br. Rutherford, there was one man who became the leader of The Watch Tower Society (with the help of those who opposed this dear brother). He and his six intimates (a total of "seven heads") set up the things in order for you to be defeated and the truth thrown to the ground. By doing this they were selling you to the "sons of the Greeks". (Joel 3:6) How did they do this? By making the "error book", or, to be more specifically, The New World Translation (it should be called - of the old world). This translation brought severe misrepresentations to the biblical truth."
Didn't make it past the second paragraph:
"For many years you have been defeated by the "beast". It had a fight with you and it overcame you, because it was meant to be this way, for the fulfillment of what was written (Rev. 11:7). Following the death of our beloved br. Rutherford, there was one man who became the leader of The Watch Tower Society (with the help of those who opposed this dear brother). He and his six intimates (a total of "seven heads") set up the things in order for you to be defeated and the truth thrown to the ground. By doing this they were selling you to the "sons of the Greeks". (Joel 3:6) How did they do this? By making the "error book", or, to be more specifically, The New World Translation (it should be called - of the old world). This translation brought severe misrepresentations to the biblical truth."
03-01-2007, 03:46 PM
Did not mean to offend, Anthony....
The WBT Society (and others) present a past fulfillment....Robert King presents a future fulfillment (of Revelation etc.)...soooooo....This presents a different angle...a current ongoing/in the middle of...type fulfillment........say la vi, say la vi.
(Comment adjusted...instead of deleting link...)
Just another perspective of prophecy....that's all, nothing more...
The WBT Society (and others) present a past fulfillment....Robert King presents a future fulfillment (of Revelation etc.)...soooooo....This presents a different angle...a current ongoing/in the middle of...type fulfillment........say la vi, say la vi.
(Comment adjusted...instead of deleting link...)
Just another perspective of prophecy....that's all, nothing more...
03-01-2007, 04:06 PM
gogh Wrote:
Did not mean to offend, Anthony....
The WBT Society (and others) present a past fulfillment....Robert King presents a future fulfillment (of Revelation etc.)...soooooo.I thought this might present a different angle...a current ongoing/in the middle of...type fulfillment....no never mind/say la vi,  say la vi.
I'll delete it.
The WBT Society (and others) present a past fulfillment....Robert King presents a future fulfillment (of Revelation etc.)...soooooo.I thought this might present a different angle...a current ongoing/in the middle of...type fulfillment....no never mind/say la vi,  say la vi.
I'll delete it.
LOL - You can put it back it up. I didnt find it offensive, just silly.
03-01-2007, 04:21 PM
No less silly than the WBT Society or Robert Kings stuff...imo.
(I like the part were one gets to know what 666 is...grin...).
Why be attributing bible prophesy to everyone/thing else (UN etc.), when Revelation just might be exclusively intended for those endeavoring to worship in spirit and truth?
Rev. 1:1..."A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves ..."
(disclaimer: whatever gets me off the hook for misleading in any way...big........ grin.)
(oops...one more thing...don't be distracted by the reference to Jacob 5:11.....another grin,...)
(I like the part were one gets to know what 666 is...grin...).
Why be attributing bible prophesy to everyone/thing else (UN etc.), when Revelation just might be exclusively intended for those endeavoring to worship in spirit and truth?
Rev. 1:1..."A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves ..."
(disclaimer: whatever gets me off the hook for misleading in any way...big........ grin.)
(oops...one more thing...don't be distracted by the reference to Jacob 5:11.....another grin,...)
04-10-2007, 03:58 PM
gogh ,
as I can understand , you deleted a quote from the first article posted on site  www.geocities.com/sas_gavril Â
what was your reason to do that ?  --- as you know , the truth does not originate from humans , so every human soul trusting in it's Author may use it freely !
as I can understand , you deleted a quote from the first article posted on site  www.geocities.com/sas_gavril Â
what was your reason to do that ?  --- as you know , the truth does not originate from humans , so every human soul trusting in it's Author may use it freely !
04-10-2007, 04:38 PM
Hi rus virgil
Yes, you are correct. My original post contained some information and a link to your site/essay.
Upon your arrival and subsequent posting of a link to your essay...I felt my reference to this information was pointless. I thought it useful, to a degree, as different interpretations are interesting....yet since have had second thoughts about directing any to interpretations that present assumtions that lead to many questions, thus would like to delete this topic....or am hoping it will just go away.....grin.
As you can see...I have asked questions about what you have presented in your essay....this is not the topic to continue this discussion, because now you have opened your own topic to discuss your presented information.
Christian love and appreciation for presenting your research, rus virgil.
gogh
ps:
(PC Administration...Please delete this topic. Thank you.)
Yes, you are correct. My original post contained some information and a link to your site/essay.
Upon your arrival and subsequent posting of a link to your essay...I felt my reference to this information was pointless. I thought it useful, to a degree, as different interpretations are interesting....yet since have had second thoughts about directing any to interpretations that present assumtions that lead to many questions, thus would like to delete this topic....or am hoping it will just go away.....grin.
As you can see...I have asked questions about what you have presented in your essay....this is not the topic to continue this discussion, because now you have opened your own topic to discuss your presented information.
Christian love and appreciation for presenting your research, rus virgil.
gogh
ps:
(PC Administration...Please delete this topic. Thank you.)