04-19-2010, 09:57 AM
04-19-2010, 10:11 AM
Yes....which is why Science is not enough. :D
Something "more" is needed. ;)
Something "more" is needed. ;)
04-19-2010, 11:43 AM
I say no,. Not beyond science, but yes, beyond present scientific knowledge.:siskiss:
04-19-2010, 11:50 AM
e-magine Wrote:
I say no,. Not beyond science, but yes, beyond present scientific knowledge.:siskiss:
Yes, I agree with you bro.
When I said "no" - I meant that it is not possible without something else...and that something else isnt in a scientific textbook! :thumbsup:
04-19-2010, 11:57 AM
digital_punk Wrote:
e-magine Wrote:
I say no,. Not beyond science, but yes, beyond present scientific knowledge.:siskiss:
Yes, I agree with you bro.
When I said "no" - I meant that it is not possible without something else...and that something else isn't in a scientific textbook! :thumbsup:
I knew that. Just clarifying.:P
I had a "discussion" with a CO once, where he insisted that miracles were not bound by scientific laws and logic. :shocked:
10-21-2010, 02:42 PM
I have sat down and had this "Arguement" with my husband a few times. For some reason unknown to me, the second you can scientifically explain a miracle, he stops believing it to be a miracle. For me, if I can explain how it works, it simply makes me more in awe with God's mysterious ways. For the right things to happen at a particular time...
I also don't believe in coincidences. I strongly feel that when we acknowledge them that we are acknowledging something we were meant to see. To cast it aside is, to me, the greatest sadness.
I do not believe that miracles are beyond analysis, I just believe we do not yet have the technology to properly explain it all. The more we delve, the more we realize how intricate and beautiful every aspect of the universe is. :grouphug:
I also don't believe in coincidences. I strongly feel that when we acknowledge them that we are acknowledging something we were meant to see. To cast it aside is, to me, the greatest sadness.
I do not believe that miracles are beyond analysis, I just believe we do not yet have the technology to properly explain it all. The more we delve, the more we realize how intricate and beautiful every aspect of the universe is. :grouphug:
10-21-2010, 02:58 PM
Problem is, many miracles are not repeatable.
That is, God ain't going to part the Red Sea again, just so scientists can get out their equipment and start prodding Moses :D
A miracle may have a scientific explanation, but that explanation might not get through a peer reviewed journal because they can't repeat the experiment in a lab.
For example, I don't want my local science lab attempting to repeat the "Big Bang" :whistle:
That is, God ain't going to part the Red Sea again, just so scientists can get out their equipment and start prodding Moses :D
A miracle may have a scientific explanation, but that explanation might not get through a peer reviewed journal because they can't repeat the experiment in a lab.
For example, I don't want my local science lab attempting to repeat the "Big Bang" :whistle:
10-21-2010, 06:22 PM
The Large Hadron Collider is attempting to do just that, but on a small scale. I have read evidence that every miracle that Jesus performed, was fundamentally a repeat of one performed in the Old Testament
10-22-2010, 12:09 PM
e-magine Wrote:
I have read evidence that every miracle that Jesus performed, was fundamentally a repeat of one performed in the Old Testament
:scratchhead:
Who, in the OT walked on water? I musta missed that one.:read:
10-22-2010, 12:16 PM
Resolute Wrote:
e-magine Wrote:
I have read evidence that every miracle that Jesus performed, was fundamentally a repeat of one performed in the Old Testament
:scratchhead:
Who, in the OT walked on water? I musta missed that one.:read:
Perhaps the Red Sea was still a bit wet underfoot :funnyface:
10-22-2010, 03:06 PM
man hu Wrote:
Resolute Wrote:
e-magine Wrote:
I have read evidence that every miracle that Jesus performed, was fundamentally a repeat of one performed in the Old Testament
:scratchhead:
Who, in the OT walked on water? I musta missed that one.:read:
Perhaps the Red Sea was still a bit wet underfoot :funnyface:
I said fundamentally. I think Elijah made an axe head float, and Jesus tamed the Dead Sea (control over water)
10-23-2010, 06:05 PM
e-magine Wrote:
.....and Jesus tamed the Dead Sea (control over water)
Go North, young man, go North!:whistle:
10-23-2010, 07:42 PM
Resolute Wrote:
e-magine Wrote:
.....and Jesus tamed the Dead Sea (control over water)
Go North, young man, go North!:whistle:
Wups :bangin:, Sea of Galilee.
Any way, thanks for calling me a young man!