02-27-2010, 07:57 PM
Hello to everyone at Paradise Cafe:
I'm "Fugitive1" and I'm new here at Paradise Cafe. I just recently learned of this board's existence because someone posted a link to this board at Beliefnet where I am a member, so I decided to join you guys here at Paradise Cafe. It seems like a nice, pleasant board, at least to me.
Just so you will know, I am not a Jehovah's Witness nor have I ever been one. But all my immediate family are Jehovah's Witnesses and have been for years. (When I was a youth, I went to all the meetings and all. So, I'm thoroughly familiar with the teachings of JWs.) However, I'm not completely convinced Jehovah's Witnesses really have the truth, but I'm sure you know how that goes.
Anyway, while reading at Beliefnet, I noticed a good question posed to JWs about the identity of the Rider of the White Horse in Revelation 6:1, 2. What I would like to know, is your opinion of some information posted on this board (beliefnet) about this verse. (I'm "Detroit Intellect" over there.), How do you see the following information presented about the identity of the Rider of the White Horse (Rev.6:1, 2), as I have never seen it discussed before. I'm asking here, since over at the other board, JWs have the habit of AVOIDING difficult questions, if you know what I mean. So, I don't expect much of a response to the question.
I hope posting this info at Paradise Cafe is okay by board rules. (Thanks!)
Here is the information, from which my question is drawn:
--------------------------------snip------------------
Hi Newtonian,
Just thought I'd ask you while you are here, and since you are an active Jehovah's Witnesses and all, how do you and JWs explain Jesus Christ sitting upon Jehovah's Throne for close to 2,000 years, and yet all that while, he was NOT to be considered a "conqueror" in Jehovah God's eyes?
Finished Mystery (1969), p.191 simply asserts:
"At the time of his message to the Laodicean congregation, about the year 96 C.E., Jesus Christ had already SAT DOWN WITH HIS HEAVENLY FATHER ON HIS THRONE and at his right hand. (Acts 2:32-36; 7:55, 56; 1 Peter 3:22) But since 1914 C.E. and since his installation as king to reign in the midst of his enemies in fulfillment of Psalm 110:1-6, he grants to his conquering followers to sit on his heavenly throne with him as reigning King."
Also, didn't Jesus himself actually say in the first century to the Laodicean Congregation, as of 96 CE according to the WTBTS, he himself was, in fact, a "Conqueror"? (Rev. 3:21)
If so, why are Jehovah's Witnesses saying Jesus only became a "conqueror" (Rev. 6:1, 2) only since the year of 1914? Aren't Jehovah's Witnesses and the WTBTS OUTRIGHT CONTRADICTING Jesus' own words here at Rev. 3:21, in effect calling Jesus a liar?
Revelation 3:21 New World Translation clearly says: To the one that conquers I will grant to sit down with me on my throne, even as I conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne.
....just wondering.
Janet
PS: How can Jesus help Laodicean christians get their "crown" ... if he has NOT himself, received his? Does that make sense to you?
Isn't that kind of like a person being a lifeguard at the beach, but NOT himself being able to swim? Who can he help as a lifeguard, if he is not a master at swimming himself?
-------------------------------------snip---------------------
Fugitive1
I'm "Fugitive1" and I'm new here at Paradise Cafe. I just recently learned of this board's existence because someone posted a link to this board at Beliefnet where I am a member, so I decided to join you guys here at Paradise Cafe. It seems like a nice, pleasant board, at least to me.
Just so you will know, I am not a Jehovah's Witness nor have I ever been one. But all my immediate family are Jehovah's Witnesses and have been for years. (When I was a youth, I went to all the meetings and all. So, I'm thoroughly familiar with the teachings of JWs.) However, I'm not completely convinced Jehovah's Witnesses really have the truth, but I'm sure you know how that goes.
Anyway, while reading at Beliefnet, I noticed a good question posed to JWs about the identity of the Rider of the White Horse in Revelation 6:1, 2. What I would like to know, is your opinion of some information posted on this board (beliefnet) about this verse. (I'm "Detroit Intellect" over there.), How do you see the following information presented about the identity of the Rider of the White Horse (Rev.6:1, 2), as I have never seen it discussed before. I'm asking here, since over at the other board, JWs have the habit of AVOIDING difficult questions, if you know what I mean. So, I don't expect much of a response to the question.
I hope posting this info at Paradise Cafe is okay by board rules. (Thanks!)
Here is the information, from which my question is drawn:
--------------------------------snip------------------
Hi Newtonian,
Just thought I'd ask you while you are here, and since you are an active Jehovah's Witnesses and all, how do you and JWs explain Jesus Christ sitting upon Jehovah's Throne for close to 2,000 years, and yet all that while, he was NOT to be considered a "conqueror" in Jehovah God's eyes?
Finished Mystery (1969), p.191 simply asserts:
"At the time of his message to the Laodicean congregation, about the year 96 C.E., Jesus Christ had already SAT DOWN WITH HIS HEAVENLY FATHER ON HIS THRONE and at his right hand. (Acts 2:32-36; 7:55, 56; 1 Peter 3:22) But since 1914 C.E. and since his installation as king to reign in the midst of his enemies in fulfillment of Psalm 110:1-6, he grants to his conquering followers to sit on his heavenly throne with him as reigning King."
Also, didn't Jesus himself actually say in the first century to the Laodicean Congregation, as of 96 CE according to the WTBTS, he himself was, in fact, a "Conqueror"? (Rev. 3:21)
If so, why are Jehovah's Witnesses saying Jesus only became a "conqueror" (Rev. 6:1, 2) only since the year of 1914? Aren't Jehovah's Witnesses and the WTBTS OUTRIGHT CONTRADICTING Jesus' own words here at Rev. 3:21, in effect calling Jesus a liar?
Revelation 3:21 New World Translation clearly says: To the one that conquers I will grant to sit down with me on my throne, even as I conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne.
....just wondering.
Janet
PS: How can Jesus help Laodicean christians get their "crown" ... if he has NOT himself, received his? Does that make sense to you?
Isn't that kind of like a person being a lifeguard at the beach, but NOT himself being able to swim? Who can he help as a lifeguard, if he is not a master at swimming himself?
-------------------------------------snip---------------------
Fugitive1