Paradise Cafe Discussions - A Place For Bible Research And Christian Encouragement

Full Version: Zech. 8:23 "you" or "you people"?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

fzubair Wrote:
[quote=digital_punk]
[quote=fzubair]I look at most of the interpretations that are offered and becuse they feel so similar to what the Wintesses wrote I get bored and don't even read after the second line.

So it is not so easy to for anybody to get me hooked on to something like how WT did!

:DTo be fair and square with you when I took the jump in the wt baptismal pool there were two reasons:

WT was my immigration visa from Islam to Christianinty:D
And some of the females in the congregations looked promising

Alas the first objective was gloriously materialized.
The second one the less said the better.

In any case what I mean to say is that are really the people on this board such simple minded folks that they would be duped yet once again???

Good health to you
fz

Good point zoobear!

Actually, I'm not as inquisitional as you might think, for reasons you know as well as I. The WT was very good as slight-of-hand ... ie, by first feeding us with exposed lies of false religion and then building their own truth upon flawed logic and reason until trust is implicit. Then they surgically removed scriptures from their context to create an even greater lie, demanding trust over matters of pure speculation, threatening apostate expulsion and our rejection along with shunning from family and friends for not being complicit!

Is that not the recipe for our excessive suspicion over everything else that comes our way and smacks of the same kind of conspiracy? We have emerged as abused children from a cultish mother church and have no trust. So, everything you say is true, Farhat! I couldn't agree more!

Fugitive 1, you are in my prayers if you are still captive to living waters. My apologies to you if you are free of them. And happy are you if you are free from all other man-and-devil-made doctrine. Whatever cannot be explicitly proven by scripture is merely a someone's measure of faith and speculation.

sw

Hello again fugitive1 ... :hibye:

If I may ask you 'another' question :confused:... and hopefully one that you will be able to answer ... ;)

You have spoken about 'this man' ... this 'Jew' being mentioned in a number of scriptures now ... and it would appear to me that you do not think that this 'man' was Jesus as various points in the verses you use you say has not occurred yet ...

I hope I have the gist of your thoughts ... :blush:

Since I have yet to see you say WHO you think this is referring ... may I ask now? :questioning:

Who do you think this 'man' or 'Jew' is ... and when do you think he will appear? :thinking::dontknow:

Is that a fair question to ask since we have told you who we think it is?:giverose:

Just wondering ... BR :sheepy: :bouncyhearts:

Fugitive1 Wrote:
Hi E-magine:

Here is some additional scriptures that I believe could possibly apply to the "Man" or "Jew" in Zech. 8:23.... "who leads everyone to GOD" and who apparently is also the Davidic (Jew) Heir in Bible Prophecy!

I want you to consider these scriptures:

Passage Psalm 72:10-11 NLT:

10 The western kings of Tarshish and other distant lands
will bring him tribute.
The eastern kings of Sheba and Seba
will bring him gifts.
11 All kings will bow before him,
and all nations will serve him.

Passage Isaiah 49:7 NLT:

7 The Lord, the Redeemer
and Holy One of Israel,
says to the one who is despised and rejected by the nations,
to the one who is the servant of rulers:
“Kings will stand at attention when you pass by.
Princes will also bow low
because of the Lord, the faithful one,
the Holy One of Israel, who has chosen you.”

What are your thoughts?

Fugitive1/Detroit Intellect


Hi Fug!. I gave thought to those scriptures, and they seem to point to Jesus, either in his first manifestation, or in his future one. Neither scripture rule out Jesus as the "Man".
So I also ask, what ARE your thoughts?

BruisedReed Wrote:
Hello again fugitive1 ... :hibye:

If I may ask you 'another' question :confused:... and hopefully one that you will be able to answer ... ;)

You have spoken about 'this man' ... this 'Jew' being mentioned in a number of scriptures now ... and it would appear to me that you do not think that this 'man' was Jesus as various points in the verses you use you say has not occurred yet ...

I hope I have the gist of your thoughts ... :blush:

Since I have yet to see you say WHO you think this is referring ... may I ask now? :questioning:

Who do you think this 'man' or 'Jew' is ... and when do you think he will appear? :thinking::dontknow:

Is that a fair question to ask since we have told you who we think it is?:giverose:

Just wondering ... BR :sheepy: :bouncyhearts:




Hi Bruised Reed:

You asked:

Quote:
“Who do you think this 'man' or 'Jew' is ... and when do you think he will appear?”



Actually, I don’t have ANY idea who he is!

The prophecies suggest that he comes in the “final part of the days.” (Isaiah 2 & Micah 4 NWT) But your guess is as good as mine on this one. And it does not seem to be any certainty among the others that I have talked to so far, about the identity of this "Man" or "Jew".

You see, ever since I first read this prophecy about 2-3 years ago in my own bible, I’ve been pondering this question of Zechariah 8:23 and how it applies. My JW relative told me the “man” was the “anointed” remnant of JWs. I balked at that interpretation and told him so. I told him, I read the prophecy in the NWT bible, but noted it was the only bible that I had found, that used “YOU people” for the man. He said the JWs didn’t mind being different from everyone else in the world. I wasn’t impressed.

Since then, I’ve gotten into conversation after conversation with other people regarding this prophecy, at the barber shop, people on the job, ministers/preachers, even some Mormons who came to my door once. They all seemed baffled by this prophecy. None of them could explain it. They all said that they would “get back with me,” but none of them ever did.

Then while surfing the net, over at Beliefnet, some JWs and xJWs were discussing the prophecy (and 1914) at length. One of them brought up the “Man from Bozrah” taken from Isaiah 63rd chapter. I decided to copy some of the material, and bring it over to Paradise Café to get Your opinion on it, but the info was promptly deleted off the board. Anyway, if you would like to read it, here is the link:

http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread...0-22?pg=11

I pretty much get most of my information from things I glean off the net and from stuff that I read. But anyway, that’s the extent of my knowledge on the topic, although I haven’t given up and I’m still searching for that answer.

Fugitive1/Detroit Intellect

e-magine Wrote:

Fugitive1 Wrote:
Hi E-magine:

Here is some additional scriptures that I believe could possibly apply to the "Man" or "Jew" in Zech. 8:23.... "who leads everyone to GOD" and who apparently is also the Davidic (Jew) Heir in Bible Prophecy!

I want you to consider these scriptures:

Passage Psalm 72:10-11 NLT:

10 The western kings of Tarshish and other distant lands
will bring him tribute.
The eastern kings of Sheba and Seba
will bring him gifts.
11 All kings will bow before him,
and all nations will serve him.

Passage Isaiah 49:7 NLT:

7 The Lord, the Redeemer
and Holy One of Israel,
says to the one who is despised and rejected by the nations,
to the one who is the servant of rulers:
“Kings will stand at attention when you pass by.
Princes will also bow low
because of the Lord, the faithful one,
the Holy One of Israel, who has chosen you.”

What are your thoughts?

Fugitive1/Detroit Intellect


Hi Fug!. I gave thought to those scriptures, and they seem to point to Jesus, either in his first manifestation, or in his future one. Neither scripture rule out Jesus as the "Man".
So I also ask, what ARE your thoughts?


Hi E-magine,

I cited Psalms 72 and Isaiah 49 because I thought they contained some very interesting verses that could give us a slightly different angle on these prophecies, which could possibly shed some light on the "man" and "Jew" of Zechariah 8:23.

Passage Psalm 72:15 NLT:

15 Long live the king!
May the gold of Sheba be given to him.
May the people always pray for him
and bless him all day long.

For example I noticed in Psalms 72:15, how we could ask ourselves some very interesting questions about it. For instance:

1. When would earthlings ever find it appropriate to "pray for" Jesus, in his glorified heavenly position in heaven? Does heavenly enthroned Jesus really need people on earth, to "PRAY FOR HIM"? Does that make sense?

2. When would people on earth need to give heavenly Jesus, "gold," and why would Jesus need "gold" to be given him? Of what use would "gold" be to Jesus, in his heavenly state anyway? Does that make sense?

3. Why would humans on earth, need to invoke "blessings" from God, for Jesus? Jesus has already been exalted to the most "blessed" state ever attained to by any of God's creation, at his heavenly resurrection in the first century. Jesus has immortality and incorruptibility, for all eternity. So, why would this need to be said of him, in this verse?

These are my thoughts.

Fugitive1/Detroit Intellect

Fugitive1 Wrote:

Prodigal Son Wrote:
Well, if Zech. 8:23 IS talking about Burney, then 10 would be a literal number. Just change "men" to "women" and you've got the Living Waters Cult!!

:drinking:
Jimmy C.


For your information, #1) I am NOT Donald Burney!, #2) I am NOT a member of the Living Waters Group, #3) In fact, I am NOT a member of ANY Religion or Sect, #4) I was raised a JW but I was never a baptised JW, #5) Just because YOU, generally, do not like my comments, does not automatically make me belong to a Cult, and #6) I am "well" read as you should already know.:read:

So please refrain from making any more of your "slick" comments to me, and I won't make any to YOU.....understood?:ok:

fugitive1/Detroit Intellect


Well Fugi, as you can see, I never made any comment about you personally, only about the Burney cult, and yes it was a quip, I couldn't resist. I have to wonder why you would take this so personally then, if you have nothing to do with this group.

Believe me, I don't judge anyone for what they believe, but the great Master Jesus had something to say about false Christs.

By the way, the 2-messiah concept is not new. It is very prevalent in Essene and Gnostic traditions, having to do with duality (polarity, similar to yin and yang) and yes, the scriptures do back up the idea. It's where we got the term 'scapegoat', as I'm sure you know. But one thing I know for sure, it has nothing to do with Don Burney!

:drinking:
Jimmy C.

Hi E-magine,

I found another one, that seems to make the same point. This one is taken from Psalms 89:27 ,which reads:

27 I will make him my firstborn son,
the mightiest king on earth. (NLT)

or 27 Also I will make him the firstborn, the highest of the Kings of the earth. (Amplified Bible)

The above verse says Jehovah "will make" or is going to (future tense) "place" or "make" this person the "firstborn" from among mankind. So, this is a future action on God's part toward the Davidic Heir. Therefore we could ask, if this verse applies to Jesus, then why would this action be necessary on God's part, since we all know Jesus was made the "firstborn" of God's creation in the heavens eons and eons of time before any human creation? Jesus is already God's "firstborn," so why would Jehovah need to make him the "firstborn" son, all over again, like this is a new thing for Jesus or something? -- See Colossians 1:15-18.

Also, it may be of some interest for us to note, the WTBTS apparently has a problem in explaining this Messianic prophecy and applying it to Jesus as "firstborn." Let's notice this comment below:

Insight On The Scriptures Vol. 1 p. 836

Firstborn, Firstling ***

Why does Jehovah refer to "David my servant" as firstborn, when David was not a firstborn son?

In Psalm 89 Jehovah refers to "David my servant" and reviews the covenant for the kingdom that was made with him. In the midst of this is the statement: "I myself shall place him as firstborn, the most high of the kings of the earth." (Ps 89:20, 27) David was not a firstborn son. (1Ch 2:13-15) So it seems that Jehovah was referring prophetically to the one foreshadowed by David, God’s own "firstborn" Son in heaven upon whom He confers kingship more exalted than that of any human ruler.—Compare Eze 34:24, where Messiah is spoken of as "my servant David."

But, clearly, if King David was NOT a "firstborn" son, and Jesus is already God's "firstborn" in the heavens and has been for untold milleniums of time, then who could this really picture, I ask?

...any thoughts?

Fugitive1/Detroit Intellect
You can't just pluck one verse out of the context of Messianic prophecy, Fugitive, and say it applies to someone other than the Messiah. The previous verses make it clear, don't they?

Psalm 69:24 "My faithfulness and My lovingkindness will be with him(David),
And in My name(YHVH) his horn (Messiah) will be exalted.
25 "I shall also set his(Messiah's) hand on the sea
And his right hand on the rivers.
26 "He(Messiah) will cry to Me, 'You are my Father,
My God, and the rock of my salvation.'
27 "I also shall make him(Messiah) My firstborn,
The highest of the kings of the earth.
(I think it goes back to addressing David here, relating to God's promise for his descendent(Messiah) to be an everlasting King)
28 "My lovingkindness I will keep for him forever,
And My covenant shall be confirmed to him.
29 "So I will establish his descendants forever
And his throne as the days of heaven.

Messiah is the "horn of David" - Psalm 132:17 There I will cause the horn of David to spring forth; I have prepared a lamp for Mine anointed. 18 His enemies I will clothe with shame, But upon himself his crown shall shine."

Quote:
why would this action be necessary on God's part, since we all know Jesus was made the "firstborn" of God's creation in the heavens eons and eons of time before any human creation? Jesus is already God's "firstborn," so why would Jehovah need to make him the "firstborn" son, all over again, like this is a new thing for Jesus or something? -- See Colossians 1:15-18.

This is about what Jesus accomplished as the Messiah, the human Son of Man. He was his human mother's firstborn son(Lu. 2:7, 23); at his resurrection he became "firstborn from the dead" and gained preeminence, superiority, in God's household. Don't stop at vs 18!
Colossians 1:18 He is also head of the body, the church; and He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that He Himself will come to have first place in everything. 19 For it was the Father's good pleasure for all the fullness to dwell in Him, 20 and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven. 21 And although you were formerly alienated and hostile in mind, engaged in evil deeds, 22 yet He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach--
1 Corinthians 15:20 But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep.

I find it ... curious... when someone declares God wouldn't have to do something - it's usually an effort to circumnavigate what His Word really says. God does what He does because - that's the plan, His Plan, whether we understand every tiny thing or not - He does!
Romans 8:28 And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose. 29 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren;
... firstborn of those called to be sons of God
Hebrews 12:23 to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the Judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect,
... head of the "church of the firstborn"
Revelation 1:5 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth To Him who loves us and released us from our sins by His blood--
... 'ruler of kings of the earth' - where have we heard that before --- oh, yes - that sounds like "the highest of the kings of the earth", doesn't it?

It IS about Jesus Christ, the Messiah, nobody else. imho.:)

... a few thoughts...

:peace:

Willa Wrote:

It IS about Jesus Christ, the Messiah, nobody else. imho.:)



Amen dear sister, Amen!! :clap:


No need for questions that lead us to anyone OTHER than Jesus! :D

No need to follow anyone OTHER than Jesus! :D

And no need to look to anyone, OTHER than Jesus! :D


Thanks again Willa -- there is so much Passion in your posts! Thanks be to God for giving you such gifts! ;):drinking::friends::giverose::grouphug:

Hi Fug!
More on what Willa said.
Maybe we are losing something in the translating. "Firstborn" may have different meanings. For example, "firstborn of all creation" really means the first creative act by YHWH, but not really an infant birth from a womb. "Firstborn for the dead" means first of mankind to be resurected as a new creation, not a actual birth. A person could be made to be a firstborn, as from Esau to Jacob. In this way, YHWH could "make" Jesus firstborn by giving him his inheritance.
Just thinking.
"I myself shall place him as firstborn, the most high of the kings of the earth." (Ps 89:20, 27) This is a "placement" as firstborn, when he receives his inheritance.
Good morning all ... :coffeeread:

Great comments willa sis oh my heart! :friends::thumbsup::happyheart:

And br. emagine it would appear indeed that the idea of 'firstborn' can have more than one meaning ...

For example when we look up Ex.4:22 it says something interesting about the nation of Israel ...

New Living Translation (©2007)
Then you will tell him, 'This is what the LORD says: Israel is my firstborn son.


Here it would appear that the meaning of the nation of Israel being 'firstborn' would be because of their 'new' position of superiority, this case being chosen by God to be his special people for a special purpose ...

Duet. 7:6 ...

GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)

6You are a holy people, who belong to the LORD your God. He chose you to be his own special possession out of all the nations on earth.


Jesus was firstborn of both his heavenly Father and by his earthly mother.

He has also been chosen by his Father in a firstborn role as future King of the Kingdom!

Just some quick thoughts ...:giverose:

Company just came and I gotta fly ... :flyinghigh:

Luv Br :sheepy: :bouncyhearts:

Willa Wrote:
You can't just pluck one verse out of the context of Messianic prophecy, Fugitive, and say it applies to someone other than the Messiah.

It IS about Jesus Christ, the Messiah, nobody else. imho.:)



Hi Willa,

I have just one question for you or anyone else who would like to answer it......Do YOU believe that JESUS is going to come back to the earth as a Man to fulfill these OT prophecies, in the final days? Yes or No? :whistle:

Fugitive/Detroit Intellect

Fugitive1 Wrote:
Hi Willa,

I have just one question for you or anyone else who would like to answer it......Do YOU believe that JESUS is going to come back to the earth as a Man to fulfill these OT prophecies, in the final days? Yes or No? :whistle:

There's the phrase 'end of the age' that's sometimes translated 'last days' that can be kind of confusing, especially when it really does mean "end of an age", but some of the prophecies you posted, I believe, as previously stated, Jesus already fulfilled in his first earthly mission.

I don't have time right now to go into it further, but I'll return tomorrow - didn't want you to think I'm ignoring you!

:peace:

Willa Wrote:

Fugitive1 Wrote:
Hi Willa,

I have just one question for you or anyone else who would like to answer it......Do YOU believe that JESUS is going to come back to the earth as a Man to fulfill these OT prophecies, in the final days? Yes or No? :whistle:

There's the phrase 'end of the age' that's sometimes translated 'last days' that can be kind of confusing, especially when it really does mean "end of an age", but some of the prophecies you posted, I believe, as previously stated, Jesus already fulfilled in his first earthly mission.

I don't have time right now to go into it further, but I'll return tomorrow - didn't want you to think I'm ignoring you!

:peace:


Hi Willa:

I Understand, but in the meantime, maybe some of your friends can give an answer. I mean Jayme, E-magine, Bruised Reed, Prodical Son or anyone else who has an interest in this thread. Again, a Yes or No is ok.

Fugitive1/Detroit Intellect

Hi there fugitive1 ... :hibye:

Well I just logged on, had my in-laws visiting yesterday and today and just noticed your post ... :)

May I ask you ... do you feel that Jesus has to be a 'man' to fulfill the prophesies about him?

Just curious ... before I try to put down in writing some scriptures I was looking over last night ... :read::giverose:

I am still trying to put my thoughts in some kind of order and sense but wanted to get your view on this ... :giverose:

Looking forward to your response ... :)

Christian love, BR :sheepy::bouncyhearts:
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reference URL's