Paradise Cafe Discussions - A Place For Bible Research And Christian Encouragement

Full Version: Astronomy's Best Kept Secret
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

Jeshurun Wrote:

Seraphim Wrote:
Its a shame that you have not answered practically any of my points that refute your position. You have some truth Jesh but your on the wrong path.


Are you referring to the Mithra thing?

I've stated this before, that Paul said the good news had already been preached in all creation under heaven...and the answer I received was that supposedly this had been accomplished by the time Paul wrote it. I don't have an answer for that type of unreasonableness. Obviously, there is some truth in the myths. The Christ energy comes on the clouds every day, hits you in the solar plexus, and gives you life, on many different levels. You believe that Jesus created the sun, right? Are we waiting for the same man Yeshua to come back, with the same flesh and blood? Or are we waiting for an all-powerful Spirit Being?

We really believe the same thing deep down, but semantics get in the way. I'm waiting for a Savior, so are you. The whole world is waiting for a savior. They all believe they have the truth. Maybe there is some truth to this "presence" thing, and the Watchtower has twisted it and used it to empower themselves. After all, the Giza pyramid did point to 1914 as a significant year.

Love,
Jesh


No we don`t believe in the same thing i`m afraid.

Jeshurun Wrote:
I'll end it here and get ready for the backlash, or probable deletion of my post.....whatever....

C'mon Jesh. Would I disown any of my own kids for speculating the phenomena of the universe? The "beware of independent thinking" addage doesn't apply here. Only when you insist on telling others what they need to believe.

As for your beliefs, to me they're only a stage of personal investigation .. a speculation of thought. What I'm trying to tell you is, it's been thought before. In other words, you're entitled to your present speculations. Just take a word from the wise (not just me) and don't get so hung up about it you can't separate fact from fiction.

And not that there isn't truth in fiction. Atlantis might be a real place. It just may have paralleled the world before the flood (with a few added speculations of its authors). Who really knows? Just because we have a proliferation of new-age philosophers, doesn't mean we're evolving. We're just being led along by higher minds that don't necessarily have our interests at heart. Need I say more?

Luff and fluff,

sw

Hi Derek

Derek Wrote:
I seem to remember, Jesus said, his father had kept working until now.


Yet the WTS (who gave you Old Earth Creation, remember) would also have you believe we've been in the "seventh day", God's day of rest... up until now. So is God resting or isn't He? :shocked:

Quote:
Also you wrote rather dogmatically:
God was using plasma, and electromagnetic forces.

Are you sure he had such a limited armory?

Was he constrained by the present laws of physics or what man knowsof the Universe up to the present day? :)


Point conceded :thumbsup:

Yes, I should not speak so dogmatically about "how God did it". I wasn't there either.

We simply have God's record to go on. He tells us how He did it, it's up to us to figure out what He means.

However, I'm still fascinated by your apparently strong belief that orthodox Science can tell us what happened.

I'm curious... what does orthodox Science tell us about how God's spirit moved to and fro on the surface of the waters?

What is the current scientific viewpoint on the nature of God's spirit?

The difference is, orthodox Science is trying to explain it all without God... so it is only ever going to be right up to a point.

Genesis 1 tells us that God's spirit was doing something to the waters... but do you think orthodox Science will even tell you WHAT God's spirit is... it's nature?

I await with baited breath the issue of Nature or New Scientist that tells me, Derek. :D

That is why I take orthodox Science with a pinch of salt. Just as they have no clue about God's spirit, why do you take them to be the last and definitive word on both the nature of the Universe... and even how OLD it is?

Scientists who tell me about the Universe are like ants in a shoebox. They can fire a rocket to get it to the next shoelace... but I'm not going to trust them to tell me WHY the shoebox is there, what's OUTSIDE the shoebox.

I prefer to listen to someone who can see the big picture. That someone is God.

He says He created the universe in 6 periods of evening and morning that he called days... "day one", "second day", "third day", "evening and morning".

Pardon me for believing someone outside of the shoebox... who actually created the shoebox... and not the pathetic ants within the shoebox that only discovered flight 100 or so years ago :D

Hi Interpretum,
You wrote:
Yet the WTS (who gave you Old Earth Creation, remember) would also have you believe we've been in the "seventh day", God's day of rest... up until now. So is God resting or isn't He? Shocked

I learned my lesson a long time ago and had a fresh look at everything and put WTS dogmatism on one side!

I do not see WT OEC, as any more credible than YEC.
God doesn't work in intermittent bursts, he's been actively working throughout time, creating new and anew and diversifying available matter and then diversifying living organisms.

It would be a rash scientist indeed, who said he knew the parameters of God's Spirit...no one knows, in heaven or on earth.

peace to you, brother
Derek
Rash indeed, for a scientist, or a theologian, to be dogmatic in this day and age!
Hi Derek

You say: "It would be a rash scientist indeed, who said he knew the parameters of God's Spirit..."

Yet you make this statement: "God doesn't work in intermittent bursts,"

People have been known to "work in intermittent burst". People are created in YHVH's image. How do you know YHVH does not "work in intermittent burst"...(according to a humans definition of time)?

(My view of creation does not fit within two views often expressed....(young earth as opposed to old earth)....my view is outside those two views...(don't ask me to explain it...grin)

Christian love

gogh

gogh Wrote:
(don't ask me to explain it...grin)




Come on bro -- now you have to explain it!!!!! :D:D:D

Hi Gogh,
I am referring to the words of Jesus:

My Father has kept working until now and I keep working.

God is not a man to grow weary.

The glacier shaping the fjord in ages ago Norway, is just as much God's finger in action as the one that shaped the two tablets.
The rain that falls and causes the plants to grow is God's work.

We didn't create the physics that make life possible, laws that continue to work to keep the universe and life in existence.

The sustainer of life does not take his spirit away from mankind or we would all expire.

WCL
Derek




gogh Wrote:
Hi Derek

You say: "It would be a rash scientist indeed, who said he knew the parameters of God's Spirit..."

Yet you make this statement: "God doesn't work in intermittent bursts,"

People have been known to "work in intermittent burst". People are created in YHVH's image. How do you know YHVH does not "work in intermittent burst"...(according to a humans definition of time)?

(My view of creation does not fit within two views often expressed....(young earth as opposed to old earth)....my view is outside those two views...(don't ask me to explain it...grin)

Christian love

gogh

Hi Beau,
Gogh is using irony on me.:)
I deserved it, but I am surprised, I thought these guys didn't have such an arrow in their 'quiver'! :);)
Derek

digital_punk Wrote:

gogh Wrote:
(don't ask me to explain it...grin)




Come on bro -- now you have to explain it!!!!! :D:D:D

Re: "Gogh is using irony on me."

I'm relived.

I'm thankful you did not say: "Gogh is being sardonic."

:drinking:
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Reference URL's