What's wrong with this picture:
Come to me/listen to me....I can (God has given me the power) to prophecy for you.
Come to me/listen to me....I can (God has given me the power) predict for you.
Come to me/listen to me.....I can (God has given me the power) heal you.
Come to me/listen to me....I can (God has given me the power) teach you truth.
Yes, those remind me of watchman - it was all about him, his 'only-i-can-see-the-truth' views, predicting year after year the 'October surprise', spreading his 'word' in the form of letters to Bethel and cong. elders and books and blogs and videos... "Tell all the people you know about my site so they too can know the real truth..." Oh yeah, the whole mess could've been 'healed' by his prophetic prowess if only everyone had listened, eh? Mock humility or none. I don't think that's the m.o. of anyone here - at least I hope not!
How can one avoid drawing attention to themselves when manifesting out of the ordinary "powers"?
Worship in spirit and truth via absolute faith in our Master Shepperd cannot attract attention to personality, imo.
This has concerned me as well, gogh. How does one retain humility in teaching - 'cause we all do 'teach' in this medium, by our words. However, I've never had prophetic visions or dreams, so I don't know how I'd handle that, lol. The Bible does say that in the last days God's spirit will be poured out and men and women will "see visions and dream dreams".... but I tend to think it won't be as sparce, diverse individual messages, but a global encounter where every one of God's children will experience the same messages - a unifying blessing which we'll know is from the undoubtable Source - but that's just the feeling I get from those scriptures. They don't really go into as much detail as we'd like, do they? Peter applied Joel 2:28 to Pentecost, but have we seen the events of vss 26 and 27 leading up to that prophecy? So there may've been an initial fulfillment and a yet future one.:dontknow:
It seems "indulging in dreams" ,imo, is an analysis of a dream as having significance beyond what it is.
Jude 8: "In like manner, notwithstanding, these men, too, indulging in dreams, are defiling the flesh and disregarding lordship and speaking abusively of glorious ones." "Yet these [men] are speaking abusively of all the things they really do not know; but all the things that they do understand naturally like the unreasoning animals, in these things they go on corrupting themselves."
In other words, is scripture not indicating that those that "indulge in dreams" "go on corrupting themselves"?
The corruption described here, imho, was the beginning of the gnostic avenue away from the apostolic teachings - "defiling the flesh" in immoral ways as part of their 'worship', speaking abusively of glorious ones - speaking against God and Christ - "who needs them when we have the power within ourselves to become gods?"? So.. I'm not seeing that this is what we have here.
One thing that we may have overlooked though, is the peaceful way prophecies should be accepted or rejected - by "interpreter". Joseph was an interpreter of dreams in Gen. 40-42; Gideon accepted the interpretation of a vision just from overhearing a conversation at Judges 7:13-15; Daniel started out as an interpreter in ch. 2(notice his humble attitude in vs.30), 5, and 7 and then had his own vision in ch. 8. There are things in common with those instances - it was always about God's will working out, not about the visionary or the interpreter. And they seem to be selective circumstances, not visons upon visions of disconnected subjects - they served an immediate purpose, and sometimes a future purpose, but that was made clear... generally...
These words of Paul are hard for me to interpret, lol -
1 Corinthians 14:26 What is the outcome then, brethren? When you assemble, each one has a psalm, has a teaching, has a revelation, has a tongue, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for edification. 27 If anyone speaks in a tongue, it should be by two or at the most three, and each in turn, and one must interpret; 28 but if there is no interpreter, he must keep silent in the church; and let him speak to himself and to God. 29 Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others pass judgment.30 But if a revelation is made to another who is seated, the first one must keep silent. 31 For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all may be exhorted; 32 and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets; 33 for God is not a God of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.
I get the feeling that what they called 'prophecy' is not the narrow definition we think now, pertaining mostly to prediction. I think it was simply reading and speaking God's word, and reinterating fine points about how the prophecies of old apply to Christ Jesus, and thus the future kingdom prophecies are sure to come also.... If they were all giving prophecies of future events, as in John's revelation, then they would've been written down and shared. So I really doubt that was the purpose. The purpose, imho, was to upbuild those foundling ecclessias with the Word of God becoming real in Christ's life, death and resurrection; God's Word through His holy prophets of old proving true through Christ; and God's future plans spoken through His prophets of old made possible through Christ.
Maybe, in that sense, we've been prophesying to each other and interpreting each others' prophecies(upholding God's word through revelations about the Christ) all the while we've known each other on the internet! And we've often heard each other say, like Daniel, it's not me - it must be the guiding of God's Spirit...
So, overall, it should be all about Christ and upbuild our confidence and faith in him and our Father. If it's about something I can't interpret then it's meaning and value are lost on me - but maybe it's for someone else?
Love you gogh-go! (big hug!)
:peace: