Paradise Cafe Discussions - A Place For Bible Research And Christian Encouragement

"For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world's population, while enabling the "elites" to live forever with the aid of advanced technology." http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/endgamedvd.html

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl...39,00.html

Overview

"As a social movement eugenics reached its height of popularity in the early decades of the 20th century. By the end of World War II eugenics had been largely abandoned,[3] though current trends in genetics have raised questions amongst critical academics concerning parallels between pre-war attitudes about eugenics and current "utilitarian" and social darwinistic theories[4]. At its pre-war zenith, the movement often pursued pseudoscientific notions of racial supremacy and purity.[5]

Eugenics was practiced around the world and was promoted by governments, and influential individuals and institutions. Its advocates regarded it as a social philosophy for the improvement of human hereditary traits through the promotion of higher reproduction of certain people and traits, and the reduction of reproduction of certain people and traits.[6]

Today it is widely regarded as a brutal movement which inflicted massive human rights violations on millions of people."...........:thinking:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

The Case for Killing Granny
Rethinking end-of-life care

http://www.newsweek.com/id/215291

"My mother wanted to die, but the doctors wouldn't let her. At least that's the way it seemed to me as I stood by her bed in an intensive-care unit at a hospital in Hilton Head, S.C., five years ago. My mother was 79, a longtime smoker who was dying of emphysema. She knew that her quality of life was increasingly tethered to an oxygen tank, that she was losing her ability to get about, and that she was slowly drowning. The doctors at her bedside were recommending various tests and procedures to keep her alive, but my mother, with a certain firmness I recognized, said no. She seemed puzzled and a bit frustrated that she had to be so insistent on her own demise.

The hospital at my mother's assisted-living facility was sustained by Medicare, which pays by the procedure. I don't think the doctors were trying to be greedy by pushing more treatments on my mother. That's just the way the system works. The doctors were responding to the expectations of almost all patients. As a doctor friend of mine puts it, "Americans want the best, they want the latest, and they want it now." We expect doctors to make heroic efforts—especially to save our lives and the lives of our loved ones.

The idea that we might ration health care to seniors (or anyone else) is political anathema. Politicians do not dare breathe the R word, lest they be accused—however wrongly—of trying to pull the plug on Grandma. But the need to spend less money on the elderly at the end of life is the elephant in the room in the health-reform debate. Everyone sees it but no one wants to talk about it. At a more basic level, Americans are afraid not just of dying, but of talking and thinking about death. Until Americans learn to contemplate death as more than a scientific challenge to be overcome, our health-care system will remain unfixable............."

CZAR WARS
Holdren says Constitution backs compulsory abortion
Argued in writings: 'Quality of life demands fewer people'
Posted: September 22, 2009 8:54 pm Eastern
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110720

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Obama science czar John Holdren stated in a college textbook he co-authored that in conditions of emergency, compulsory abortion would be sustainable under the U.S. Constitution, even with Supreme Court review.

WND has obtained a copy of "Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment," published in 1977 and co-authored by Holdren with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich's wife, Ann. As WND reported, the authors argued involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by "climate change."

To prevent ecological disasters, including "global warming," Holdren argued the U.S. Constitution would permit involuntary abortions, government-imposed sterilizations and laws limiting the number of children as steps justified under the banner of "sustainable well-being."

World Over-Population
"John Tyndall says that liberals are missing the point. Sometimes the Guardianistas tell us the truth; sometimes they do not. It all depends on what suits their agenda. But of one thing we can be sure: even when they do tell the truth the deductions they draw from that truth are crazy to the point of being downright dangerous."

Reproduction trends

Here, it will be noted, the familiar word 'inevitable' makes its appearance. Leftist-liberals love this word because of its utility as a stick to wield against those who do not welcome the liberal one-world agenda: everyone is going to get what is coming to them whether they like it or not, etc., etc., etc. But here 'inevitable' seems to mean a process which is completely out of control, whether by liberals or by others. The changes being referred to are, of course, those consequences – economic, political and social – of the grossly disparate reproduction rates currently being achieved by the world’s different races. That the white races could alter the stated trends by way of their governments encouraging larger families, while at the same declining to subsidise Third World demographic proliferation, does not even merit consideration.

And the same applies to other capable and advanced peoples like the Japanese. Says Vidal:-

'Countries such as Nigeria and Japan, which today have similar sized populations of about 130 million people, could be unrecognisable by 2050, say the authors. By then, Nigeria is expected to have more than doubled its numbers to more than 300 million people. But Japan, which has only 14 per cent of its current population under 15, may have shrunk to roughly 100 million people.'

Europe, says the survey according to Vidal, "is expected to have 60 million fewer people than today and some countries could lose more than a third of their populations." And he continues:-

'Eastern Europe is leading the world’s down-shifters. Bulgaria is expected to return to pre-1914 levels, losing 38 per cent of its people, while Romania could have 27 per cent fewer and Russia 25 million fewer people. Germany and Italy are expected to shrink by about 10 per cent.'

And:-

'The projections are based on detailed analyses of infant mortality rates, age structure, population growth, life expectancy, incomes and fertility rates. They also take into account the numbers of women using contraception and AIDS/HIV rates, but do not allow for environmental factors.'

And here’s the punch line:-

'Climate changes and ongoing land degradation are widely expected to encourage further widespread movements of people and pressure for migration away from rural areas towards cities and richer countries.'

"This is a very innocent-sounding way of telling us that in terms of Third World immigration into Britain and other white lands "we ain’t seen nothing yet!" There’s going to be a lot, lot more of it. Of course, reference to the 'land degradation' made by the writer is another way of pointing out that in Third World countries, through primitive and irresponsible methods of agriculture, resources are allowed to go to waste."

http://www.spearhead.com/0410-jt2.html

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics
By Edwin Black

(Mr. Black is the author of IBM and the Holocaust and the just released War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race, from which the following article is drawn.)

Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent and exterminated millions in his quest for a co-called "Master Race."

But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn't originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing.

Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries. California was considered an epicenter of the American eugenics movement............ http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html

Hi Freyd.

Its interesting that you mentioned the nordics.

Skin color may be the result of the environment families grew up in.
It doesn't make us any worse or any better than anyone else.
It just adds variety to the human family.

By the way I learned from one of the nature programs on TV that polar bears descended from the grizzlies.

Take care Freyd. :)