04-18-2009, 03:38 PM
Separating Religious from Biblical Doctrine
There is nothing more profound than for Jehovah’s spirit to bear witness with our spirit. (Romans 8:14-17) There is also nothing more disagreeable than seeing someone become so completely Gnostic by means of spirit that they are no longer open to reason. The unsettling truth is, anyone touched by the spirit world can become so certain, so affected that a revelation has been personally given by God, that it becomes unique to themselves alone and nothing can convince them otherwise.
“I used to believe like you,†is a common statement. “But now I see life from both sides now,†so say the lyrics of one popular song of the 60’s. So, what are we really saying? That we have “special†knowledge, a spiritual enlightenment beyond our fellow humans’ comprehension? This can be viewed as quite arrogant and condescending since some are saying in effect, “You do not believe me because I’m a spiritual man and the Bible predicted in 1 Corinthians 2:14-16 that a spiritual man understands all thingsâ€â€”concluding of course that you are not so gifted if you cannot see it—because you are just a physical man. And so anything you say thereafter is rejected because you ‘have not received the spirit.’
Which may be true if the spirit is from God. Dare we question that? Not to the spiritually Gnostic.
Most, if not all have had a spiritual awakening—anything from a glimmer to a strong sense that God has sent an enlightenment for other reasons than we can explain. But as a human sold into sin, the spirit is a dangerous substance to abuse in our three-dimensional world. And since we are not even made of the same stuff, we are not yet meant to completely grasp the spirit realm.
So when we are “enlightened†from the spirit realm, how do we know that our enlightenment was complete or from which realm? Are any humans (besides the so-called enlightened Gnostic believers) familiar with the spirit realm?
Enlightenment is a unique experience. Which is why it is so controversial. True enlightenment remains within establish Bible doctrine while the other presumes doctrine beyond that which can be Biblically proven. One is ‘Bible based’ whereas the other is ‘Religion based.’ One is from God. The other is human—presumptuous—beyond what is written and ignores Biblical contradiction. So spawns the ‘I’m spiritual’ argument.
Religious doctrines so affect the powers of reason that Biblical contradictions become invisible, veiled to its adherents. There is much in the Bible deliberately withheld that any number of religions can satisfy, which is why religion also blinds its patriots to the lies it presumes to teach as truth. That is why Jesus praised his Father for ‘hiding these things from wise and intellectual ones and revealing them to babes;’ and why Jesus refused to speak to the crowds with ‘anything but illustrations,’ but granted knowledge of sacred secrets to be later revealed—still within scripture and not esoterically. It is why John told us to ‘test the spirit or inspire expressions to see whether they originate with God.' (1 John 4:1-3; Matthew 11:25-27; 13:10-15)
How are we to test them? For one thing, they cannot presume and ignore contrary Bible text. They cannot go beyond what is written. They cannot form a doctrine that presumes itself to be Biblical when it is in fact—religious.
There is nothing more profound than for Jehovah’s spirit to bear witness with our spirit. (Romans 8:14-17) There is also nothing more disagreeable than seeing someone become so completely Gnostic by means of spirit that they are no longer open to reason. The unsettling truth is, anyone touched by the spirit world can become so certain, so affected that a revelation has been personally given by God, that it becomes unique to themselves alone and nothing can convince them otherwise.
“I used to believe like you,†is a common statement. “But now I see life from both sides now,†so say the lyrics of one popular song of the 60’s. So, what are we really saying? That we have “special†knowledge, a spiritual enlightenment beyond our fellow humans’ comprehension? This can be viewed as quite arrogant and condescending since some are saying in effect, “You do not believe me because I’m a spiritual man and the Bible predicted in 1 Corinthians 2:14-16 that a spiritual man understands all thingsâ€â€”concluding of course that you are not so gifted if you cannot see it—because you are just a physical man. And so anything you say thereafter is rejected because you ‘have not received the spirit.’
Which may be true if the spirit is from God. Dare we question that? Not to the spiritually Gnostic.
Most, if not all have had a spiritual awakening—anything from a glimmer to a strong sense that God has sent an enlightenment for other reasons than we can explain. But as a human sold into sin, the spirit is a dangerous substance to abuse in our three-dimensional world. And since we are not even made of the same stuff, we are not yet meant to completely grasp the spirit realm.
So when we are “enlightened†from the spirit realm, how do we know that our enlightenment was complete or from which realm? Are any humans (besides the so-called enlightened Gnostic believers) familiar with the spirit realm?
Enlightenment is a unique experience. Which is why it is so controversial. True enlightenment remains within establish Bible doctrine while the other presumes doctrine beyond that which can be Biblically proven. One is ‘Bible based’ whereas the other is ‘Religion based.’ One is from God. The other is human—presumptuous—beyond what is written and ignores Biblical contradiction. So spawns the ‘I’m spiritual’ argument.
Religious doctrines so affect the powers of reason that Biblical contradictions become invisible, veiled to its adherents. There is much in the Bible deliberately withheld that any number of religions can satisfy, which is why religion also blinds its patriots to the lies it presumes to teach as truth. That is why Jesus praised his Father for ‘hiding these things from wise and intellectual ones and revealing them to babes;’ and why Jesus refused to speak to the crowds with ‘anything but illustrations,’ but granted knowledge of sacred secrets to be later revealed—still within scripture and not esoterically. It is why John told us to ‘test the spirit or inspire expressions to see whether they originate with God.' (1 John 4:1-3; Matthew 11:25-27; 13:10-15)
How are we to test them? For one thing, they cannot presume and ignore contrary Bible text. They cannot go beyond what is written. They cannot form a doctrine that presumes itself to be Biblical when it is in fact—religious.