Paradise Cafe Discussions - A Place For Bible Research And Christian Encouragement

Full Version: The Antichrist Conspiracy
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Hi all :)

The Antichrist conspiracy is a long term plan to rewrite religious history by means of a created conspiracy theory, the reason you've never heard of it is because the Antichrist conspiracy is merely a snappy name I've contrived to refer to it, call it "The Jesus Myth Hypothesis" if you like or you movie buffs may prefer "MK-ULTRA: The Final Conflict" :-D

Let's start by defining the term Antichrist. As far a I'm aware; the first recorded use of the Koine Greek word antichristos comes from the first letter of John in the New Testament: "Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us. But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and all of you know the truth. I do not write to you because you do not know the truth, but because you do know it and because no lie comes from the truth. Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist—he denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also."
1 John 2:18-23 (NIV)

Next we have the second letter of John in the New Testament: "Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist."
2 John 1:7 (NIV)

So according to 1 John the antichrist is someone who "denies that Jesus is the Christ" & according to 2 John is those that "do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh". In the context of this study; its irrelevant whether or not you believe in the New Testament or whether 1 John and/or 2 John are Johannine, because this particular article isn't going to concern itself with the validity of biblical prophecy but rather is an attempt to see if there is evidence of a conspiracy.

To begin we must go to the second century C.E & the Gnostic dogma of Docetism. Docetism is the belief supposedly held by Gnostic "Christians" that Jesus body was an illusion & that he did not suffer or die on the cross/post. The idea finds expression in the Gnostic texts: Second Treatise of the Great Seth & Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter. So the Antichrist assertions that Jesus did not come in the flesh & was not crucified, appear to find there first expression among Gnostic's probably from the early part of the second century.

The Koran depicts Jesus as neither being crucified or killed, these references clearly come from a manuscript tradition other then the Gospels, The Arabic Infancy Gospel is generally regarded by scholars as the source for the Koranic references to Jesus, The Arabic Infancy Gospel is in turn believed to be based on the Gnostic Gospels: The Infancy Gospel of Thomas & The Infancy Gospel of James. However I feel its important to mention that The Koran does refer to Jesus as al-Masih or the Christ. In fact; Gnosticism seems to be the primary link in this saga, The Roman Catholic Church took a Hermetic "mix & match" approach to its theology, incorporating the Egyptian ankh or cross, the trinity of Osiris, Isis & Horus & a Platonic afterlife.

The Antichrist conspiracy in modern times explicitly begins in the latter half of the eighteenth century with the enlightenment thinker Charles François Dupuis (1742 - 1809). It's from this point onwards that the idea of Jesus as solar myth begins to emerge. Dupuis; a french savant, interested in astronomy & mythology, wrote his "magnum opus": Origin of all Religious Worship in 1795, in which he championed the unity of all myths & religions: Chapter Nine: "If there is one fable, which would seem entitled to escape the analysis, which we have undertaken of religious poems and sacred legends, by the laws of physical and astronomical science, it is doubtless that of Christ, or the legend, which under that name is really dedicated to the worship of the Sun."

Constantin François de Chassebœuf, comte de Volney (1757 - 1820) was responsible for popularizing the ideas of Dupuis with his work Les Ruines (1791) that envisioned the final unification of all the worlds religions. It's interesting to note that the Wikipedia article on Volney shows a photograph of his tomb; a giant pyramid no less..

Robert Taylor (1784 – 1844) was a clergyman turned radical, in his work The Diegesis Taylor further expanded on the unfounded idea that Christianity is little more then a re-branding of solar myths.

Helena Blavatsky (1831 - 1891) is credited with beginning the New Age Movement. She founded The Theosophical Society in 1875, the society was a hodgepodge of Gnostic theology. In her 1889 work Key to Theosophy, Blavatsky elucidated the society's objectives: "1.To form the nucleus of a Universal Brotherhood of Humanity without distinction of race, colour, or creed. 2.To promote the study of Aryan and other Scriptures, of the World's religion and sciences, and to vindicate the importance of old Asiatic literature, namely, of the Brahmanical, Buddist, and Zoroastrian philosophies. 3.To investigate the hidden mysteries of Nature under every aspect possible, and the psychic and spiritual powers latent in man especially." Key to Theosophy

"In addition to the stated objectives, as early as 1889 Blavatsky had told a group of Theosophical students that the real purpose of establishing the Society was to prepare humanity for the reception of the World Teacher when he appeared again on earth. This was repeated again more publicly by Annie Besant in 1896, five years after Blavatsky's death."

Blavatsky, Albert Pike (1809 - 1891) & Aleister Crowley (1875 - 1947) all studied Gnosticism & were heavily influenced by it. With the discovery of The Nag Hammadi library in 1945, Gnosticism came to the fore once again, the 52 mostly Gnostic manuscripts were discovered buried in a sealed jar by a local peasant, since then numerous Gnostic groups have formed including: The Society of Novus Spiritus, The Ecclesia Gnostica & The Thomasine Church, to name but a few.

Jordan Maxwell/Russell Pine is an admitted admirer of Madame Blavatsky & another proponent of the "Christ solar myth theory". In common with The Rosicrucians, Carl Jung (1875 - 1961) & the aforementioned Blavatsky; Maxwell believes we are approaching The Age of Aquarius, a time of spiritual enlightenment heralded by a great spiritual teacher. Maxwell fuses his theosophic, Antichrist discourse with Illuminati & 911 truths, as does David Icke. Maxwell's voice was featured in the film Zeitgeist: the Movie (2007) in fact the director Peter Joseph/James Coyman commented on the Jeff Rense Show that Maxwell was: "the lifeblood of the piece (Zeitgeist)". For those who don't know "Zeitgeist: The Movie" is an online film that covers the "Jesus solar myth theory", 911 & the federal Reserve Bank, a companion book to part 1 of Zeitgeist by Acharya S/D.M. Murdock writer of The Christ Conspiracy was also released. Achaya S states in her article The Origins of Christianity that: "...the most enduring and profound controversy in this subject is whether or not a person named Jesus Christ ever really existed.... when one examines this issue closely, one will find a tremendous volume of literature that demonstrates, logically and intelligently, time and again that Jesus Christ is a mythological character along the same lines as the Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Sumerian, Phoenician, Indian or other godmen, who are all presently accepted as myths rather than historical figures."

In recent years the conspiracy has picked up steam; Zecharia Sitchin who distorted ancient mythology with his Nibiru fantasies, is now experiencing something of a revival. Dan Brown has popularised the Jesus myth with his book The Da Vinci Code (2003), such myths were further buoyed by The Gospel of Judas (2006) & The Lost Tomb of Jesus (2007) documentaries. Also, due in part to the likes of Clinton Richard Dawkins, atheism has gone mainstream & become rather fashionable.

What this all amounts to is the rewriting of history by the mystery religions of the Illuminati, but perhaps the most sickening aspect to all this is the way the Illuminati have hijacked the Truth Movement for its own ends, those ends presumably being to turn the movement into a New Age cult, receptive to the machinations of Project Blue-Beam & their coming world teacher. Now that isn't to say that all the individuals I've mention are Illuminatists, its possible the Order simply introduce ideas & certain concepts into the realm of discourse, by means of academia, art & the Internet then smugly sit back & watch as people take up those ideas & run with them, positions & counter-positions arise from the interpolated disinformation, without "our masters" needing to lift a finger. You may ask: "Aren't these connections just an example of ideas mutating & spawning new cultural trends?" That could be the case, the patterns I've highlighted could more easily be explained as the result of a cultural paradolia, but bear in mind that even if you don't believe in Bible prophecy, the Mayan Long Count Calender, astrology & magick, these Lucifarian zealots seem to. The Illuminati likely see the world of ideas as paintbox & society as their canvas, to them the Antichrist conspiracy is their "Birth of Venus" the war on terror their "Mona Lisa". So what does the Antichrist conspiracy mean for the future? The truth is no one but the initiated can say, but my hope remains in Jesus Christ/Yeshua Mashiach & his promised return.

"At that time if anyone says to you, 'Look, here is the Christ!' or, 'There he is!' do not believe it. For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect—if that were possible. See, I have told you ahead of time. "So if anyone tells you, 'There he is, out in the desert,' do not go out; or, 'Here he is, in the inner rooms,' do not believe it. For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. Wherever there is a carcass, there the vultures will gather." Matthew 24:23-27 (NIV)


"To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, "If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." John 8:31-32 (NIV)

agape Johnny :heartbeat:
Hey Johnny! :thumbsup:

Good stuff! :ok:

They sure do put a lot of time and energy trying to prove that someone who never existed, never existed....don't they? :D

And that pesky Bible! It's a myth, but they sure do hate it, don't they? :thinking:

There IS good news though....I'm in the middle of reading yet another great book, Texe Marr's "Codex Magica". He goes into an indepth look at the mind of a Mason....they are psychopaths and megalomaniacs....and...Freemasonry, the entire Amway pyramid concept, is a mountain of lies. For example, tenth degree Masons are told that Masonry is NOT a religion....but at the 13th degree, it IS a religion...

Similarly, the lower degrees are told that Masonry is a benevolent Christian society, but in the later degrees, they are told it is the Luciferian Doctrine. They say, "sorry, we lied, to protect the order"....And they pick and choose those that they want to give the higher degrees to....This is all laid out in Pike's "Morals and Dogma"...all higher degree Masons are given a copy...but they don't read it! The truth is that only those at the very top of the pyramid know what they're REALLY doing, and it aint good for 95 percent of the dupes below them....so that when they're finished with them, they become "dispensable" :shocked:

The good news? When the New World Order starts turning sour, these fools will turn on each other like cats and dogs! Maybe that's why God says somewhere, He will turn each one of their swords against their own brother....Yep the BROTHERhood...is a mountain of lies....When the dung hits the rotary oscillator, the NWO will fold up like a cheap tent!:clap: They know it, they are told that it is lies, and they still keep believing lies....Why? Because its a CULT....just like the Watchtower...6 totally false Armageddon alarms, and we still believed 1975!

Whatever happened to "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me"?!?

:heartbeat:
Jesh


Hi Johnny, So glad to hear from you.. Was thinking I hadn't seen you much lately. :drinking:

This seems to be talking about the gnostic influence. I think the NWO is a misleading expression really. I also don't really like the expression. Also don't like the term of the new bad leader being called the antichrist.. Both popular though. Hey I think the NWO should be called the Old World Order.. Hee!

Hey Jesh, thanks for your kind words. :giverose:

Yup, from what I've read of "Morals & Dogma"; I got the impression that the odd, detached way that Pike's wrote was merely a device to disguise the fact that he really believed the concepts he was writing about. In fact the hubris evident in the writings of most of the people I mentioned is quite mind blowing. :whistle:

Quote:
The good news? When the New World Order starts turning sour, these fools will turn on each other like cats and dogs! Maybe that's why God says somewhere, He will turn each one of their swords against their own brother....Yep the BROTHERhood...is a mountain of lies....When the dung hits the rotary oscillator, the NWO will fold up like a cheap tent!


I suspect the same thing, just look at what happens to "the mother of the harlots" in "Revelation". :clap:

Quote:
This seems to be talking about the gnostic influence. I think the NWO is a misleading expression really. I also don't really like the expression. Also don't like the term of the new bad leader being called the antichrist.. Both popular though. Hey I think the NWO should be called the Old World Order.. Hee!


Hiya Apryl, lovely to see you too big sis! :friends:

Yeah, I wanted to show where these Jesus myths come from, they come from people usually associated with the mystery religions, or people who subscribe to the ideas of those religions. I don't even think one has to be a Christian, or believe in the existence of the Illuminarti, to be able to see evidence of a patten, an esoteric agenda.
OLD WORLD ORDER? That's funny 'cos its so true lol! :D

Please someone correct me if I got any facts wrong in my article! :thumbup:

Agape Johnny :heartbeat:

Hi Johnny

Great article :)

Yes, I think this is possibly THE MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGE facing Christians today, and unfortunately, most Christians are simply not adept enough to deal with the challenge.

We need to collectively EXPOSE these people and their sources of so-called "knowledge".

Incidentally, there is a Youtube of Jordan Maxwell, in which he basically admits he sold out to the "aliens" (aka demons). ("Jordan Maxwell" is not his real name, but is derived from one of the volumes of Blavatsky's "The Secret Doctrine".)
We need to be able to see through their so-called knowledge, because it is really an encounter with the prince of this world who tempts us with his own version of the truth, and how we repond to him is vital and the deviding line to choosing life or death. We should never leave the devine original truth, and always remember it.

Knight Of Faith Wrote:
2 John 1:7
"Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist."

:thumbup:And he-e-e-e-e-ere's Johnny again!!! (Don't you miss the "Tonight Show?")

All kidding aside, I find this expression "coming in the flesh" so intriguing because it's the first thing theologians begin arguing (as though nothing else justifies the existence of a theologian).

So, precisely what sort of flesh did Jesus don to visit us?

It seems to me Jesus would shake his head in dismay over any argument over his anatomical nature, structure or substance, whether similar, the same or different from the Father, or whether his flesh was begotten, acquired or given birth to, or whether God is a manlike image or man is a Godlike image, whether in heaven or on earth or both—all such arguments are simply unwinable! :dontknow: Call it total absence of information???:read:

I find it amazing how many books are written that argue the substance of God and Christ is more important than the qualities they possess! Why ever do people argue over what cannot be proved?

To me it would seem the interaction between the Father and Son is more important. The Bible is quite explicit, I think. It defines the authority of the Father and the Son’s willingness to submit to the Father. That is so important to us so that we do not presuppose or presume upon the One we are to worship.

In fact it is so plain to me that I fear for Gnostics and those led by them, for they seem to represent themselves as superior beings of intelligence whose sole wish is to complicate simplicity, creating greater mystery. Why? Do they love the mystery? Or is it the attention they get from solving what we subhumans cannot? Of course they would deny any such intent. And why not? Hasn’t Satan denied his intent from the beginning? Is it any wonder his followers deny theirs? (2 Corinthians 11:14)

Jesus never spoke of his substance. It was never an article of faith. It is not essential for our salvation. He kept “the Father” and “the Son” separate and distinct for a reason—to demonstrate that relationship was more important than substance.

Of course, when you argue with the Gnostic, he/she will point to such scriptures as 1 Corinthians 2:14, which they apply in a totally condescending way:

“The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.”

Never mind that the “Spirit” mention could be the Devil’s—the argument is lost to us ordinary poor mortals who cannot fathom such gnostic, irrefutable wisdom.

So here is what I conclude: Anyone who overstates or understates the flesh of Christ is the Antichrist!

:whistle:Now that’s my story and I’m sticking to it!:readthis:

sw

Hey New Heart, Smoldering Wick. :hibye:

Quote:
Incidentally, there is a Youtube of Jordan Maxwell, in which he basically admits he sold out to the "aliens" (aka demons). ("Jordan Maxwell" is not his real name, but is derived from one of the volumes of Blavatsky's "The Secret Doctrine".)

Thanks Interpretum, yes I saw the video where "Jordanus Maximus" admits this. One moment it sounds like he's talking about aliens & the next moment, demons. Sounds kinda Faustian to me. :devil:

Agape Johnny :heartbeat:

smoldering wick Wrote:
Jesus never spoke of his substance. It was never an article of faith. It is not essential for our salvation. He kept “the Father” and “the Son” separate and distinct for a reason—to demonstrate that relationship was more important than substance.


Light Bearer!:hibye:

Telling it straight, just as it is. :thumbsup:It cuts through all the reams of theory that cloud the spiritual world.


smoldering wick Wrote:

Knight Of Faith Wrote:
2 John 1:7
"Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist."

:thumbup:And he-e-e-e-e-ere's Johnny again!!! (Don't you miss the "Tonight Show?")

...

So here is what I conclude: Anyone who overstates or understates the flesh of Christ is the Antichrist!

:whistle:Now that’s my story and I’m sticking to it!:readthis:

sw


Maybe the declaration was to re-inforce Jesus' authority. Caiaphas and his 1st century contemporaries who preached Christ had not yet arrived in the flesh were deeming the sect of Christians was worthy of death for blasphemy.

Acts5v29

Acts5v29 Wrote:
Maybe the declaration was to re-inforce Jesus' authority. Caiaphas and his 1st century contemporaries who preached Christ had not yet arrived in the flesh were deeming the sect of Christians was worthy of death for blasphemy.

Acts5v29

Yes Acts5v29, they rejected him despite having all the evidence just as John 6:36 says, "You have even seen me and yet do not believe," which is why the sign of Jonah was given them. And Jonah was also flesh wasn't he? The difference being that only Jesus was "put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit" (1 Peter 3:18 ASV)

But then Caiaphas et al were not unlike contentious wannabe leaders today who really don't want to be 'brought to God,' as Peter was inspired to write. They want God brought to them and to be recognized for the recognition they crave. (and sell the odd book to boot!)

:heartbeat:sw

smoldering wick Wrote:
...

But then Caiaphas et al were not unlike contentious wannabe leaders today who really don't want to be 'brought to God,' as Peter was inspired to write. They want God brought to them and to be recognized for the recognition they crave. (and sell the odd book to boot!)

:heartbeat:sw


Good point! :thumbup:

At least Caiaphas was high priest in Jerusalem, and having been central to God's pathway for 1500 years, he could have felt responsibility to Israel and historical justification to his feelings, even though he knew that Jesus really was the change in direction.

Modern-day wannabees (and not-so modern) have no such justification. I wonder why a love of God - which they must have - turns to a yearning for prominence? Seems like a bad swap. But there's always a way back - we've all been ambitious at some time. There's a real warm feeling in imagining all those whom you know running ahead of you on the road to life, occasionally looking back and encouraging you to keep going. Who can encourage a man stood on a pedestal?

Acts5v29

Acts5v29 Wrote:
At least Caiaphas was high priest in Jerusalem, and having been central to God's pathway for 1500 years, he could have felt responsibility to Israel and historical justification to his feelings, even though he knew that Jesus really was the change in direction.

This is actually a good point. There was a certain dignity felt by the Jewish custodians of temple law and tradition and their ignorance wasn't altogether wicked but mistaken.

Getting back to this Antichrist conspiracy, I would say Dan Brown's compilation of misinformation into the so-called historical, adventure/drama, Da Vinci Code, is one of the most disturbing conspiracy theories out there, seeing so many believed just by reading it that Jesus didn't die but married Mary Magdalene and started his own family. Now that's typically antichrist, in my opinion.
:heartbeat:
sw

Reference URL's