(This is a (very) long post, because I'm jumping in, so here's what's in it:
responses to Willa, Deborah, Yannis, Totaldismay, observant, OneTheEdge, e-magine)
I'm sorry for the length, but there's a lot of stuff that needs addressing. :ok: Bear with me.
Nice is good - Jesus was/is nice.
Matthew 23
32 “Fill up, then, the measure of the guilt of your fathers. 33 “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?
Jesus is our example: whether or not a person is nice has nothing to do with how harsh his/her words are. And all you know of Joyful are her words.
Jesus used those words to people who misused power. He got along quite well with the samaritans and tax collectors and prostitutes. Don't you think.
Words are everything bro.
Proverbs 18
21 Words kill, words give life;
they're either poison or fruit—you choose.
21Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.
It doesn't matter how much an unbeliever is doing "the right thing," because they are still enemies of God, no matter HOW "good" they are!
I will leave the military out of this. You think the unbeliever is an enemy of God.... even if they are good:headbang:
But to say that military in itself is evil or beyond salvation will make us hypocrites. I need them but I will hate them doesn't sound good to me.
If you need any secular thing which tramples the teachings of Christ underfoot, then how can you follow Christ wholeheartedly? How can you be a Christian if one of your secular needs cancels out your ability to supply your spiritual needs?
If our Holy Heavenly Father empathized with Naaman's situation, we imperfect beings need to show some more grace before damning an entity...
Acts 17:30
Though God has overlooked those times of ignorance, he now commands everyone everywhere to repent,
Jesus is our example, not Naaman.
Naaman wasn't the example. God allowed something, didn't he.
No one is judging anyone. We are just establishing that you are not following Jesus' command if you put stock in an institution like the military.
Do you get the point?
Is establishing that someone is disregarding God's command not judging!
That's fine. But the difference is, you aren't talking about CHRISTIANS.
Who are Christians to you. Hav eyou set a standard. Do you read people's hearts
God's Law was to be feared by the UNrighteous, and loved by the righteous.
Secular law isn't God's law. The governments of the world couldn't care less about God's law.
But some of their laws are innately understood to be necessary (like don't steal, don't kill, don't lie, etc). So they work, and God allows them to keep criminals in check.
Yes they are necessary just as the military.
You say that Jesus didn't sugar coat his words. There is no such thing as sugar coating. He is sweeter than honey. He empathized with people, he used parables to make people understand.
Let me rephrase that:
"...with people who wanted to listen...with people who were open to His teachings..."
Again, Deborah, asking rhetorically how a person will escape the fires of hell isn't very sweet.
The point is Jesus got along well with groups like tax collectors, prostitutes etc. Tax collectors and prostitutes enter the kingdom of God, Jesus said (Matthew 21:31) He saw what they could become. Labeling pro military doesn't look like his style
He was furious with people abusing power, who misuse the Name of God.