04-06-2008, 08:24 PM
Hi Folks
I was originally writing a reply to someone's post, but I thought I'd turn this into a more general discussion.
I notice that many here believe in a Futurist scenario involving a great tribulation, sun and moon darkening, an antichrist figure sitting in a rebuilt Jewish Temple and making (and then breaking) a covenant with the Jews, while the New World Order imposes its chip implants on the world... or variations on the above themes.
Most of these scenarios are built around prophetic passages such as Mathew 24, Luke 21 and most of Revelation.
The problem I have is, to me it now seems pretty clear that the bulk of those prophecies could only be fulfilled in the 1st century.
For example, Jesus said of the "great tribulation", that it would be something that had "not occurred since the world’s beginning until now, no, nor will occur again." In other words, it would be a one-off event. It could not have a type and an anti-type, or a dual fulfillment!
Furthermore, he repeatedly said that the generation to which he preached - "this generation" - was the generation to experience that wrath:
"I am sending forth to YOU prophets and wise men and public instructors. Some of them YOU will kill and impale, and some of them YOU will scourge in YOUR synagogues and persecute from city to city; that there may come upon YOU all the righteous blood spilled on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zech·a·ri´ah son of Bar·a·chi´ah, whom YOU murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. Truly I say to YOU, All these things will come upon this generation." (Mathew 23:34-36)
"... these are days for meting out justice, that all the things written may be fulfilled. Woe to the pregnant woman and the ones suckling a baby in those days! For there will be great necessity upon the land and wrath on this people..." (Luke 21:22,23)
"Truly I say to you that this generation will by no means pass away until all these things occur." (Mathew 24:34)
We know that all of the things Jesus described in Luke 21 and Mathew 24 came about before the destruction of Jerusalem...
- Wars. (In fact, the Roman empire even degenerated into civil war upon the death of Nero in 68AD).
- Famines, earthquakes - read Josephus.
- Good news preached in all inhabited earth. This was confirmed by the apostle Paul.
- Jerusalem surrounded by encamped armies. Fulfilled in 66AD.
- Christians to flee. Historically, they fled to Pella.
- Jerusalem trampled. The Romans breached Jerusalem in 70AD, and the Jewish war continued for three and a half years, until Masada was captured in 73AD.
- Jews led into captivity into all the nations. Fuifilled.
- Christ came in a cloud. This probably causes Christians the most difficulty, but we should understand that Jehovah uses this kind of language when he comes against a city. For example, compare Isaiah 66:6 and 66:15,16 to see the language Jehovah used to express his anger against those committing badness in his Temple and in Jerusalem - he would come as a fire, and a storm wind to slay the wicked in the land.
Or compare Joel 2, which describes the army of Chaldeans that God was foretelling He would bring upon the land (which he also promised he would restore and make compensation for) - which would be "a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick gloom." (Joel 2:1,2)
So if we can grasp that Christ came in the clouds upon Jerusalem in 70AD, and gave them plenty of signs, even physical ones in heaven (such as the star shaped as a cross that hung over Jerusalem before its destruction, as recorded by Josephus), then we can accept that Mathew 24 and Luke 21 have been fulfilled, because they were prophecies recorded for the 1st century Jews.
(That is not to say there is not a future revealing - there almost certainly is, as recorded in Revelation 19, which I don't believe is the same thing.)
On the other hand, Revelation was written to 7 congregations in Asia, and were recorded for their benefit.
I won't go into all the evidence here, but I believe it points to it having been written during Nero's reign, sometime in the 60's of the 1st century (Nero started persecuting Christians from 62AD, but died in 68AD, so this is the most likely window for its authorship), but before the destruction of Jerusalem.
Revelation uses symbolic language to describe events leading up to and including the fall of Jerusalem, in chapters 6 to 11 - so that the 1st century Christians could understand the relevance of Jerusalem's fall to God's overall plan - and so that they could understand the connections with the Old Testament prophets.
So, for example, in the "fifth trumpet", John sees the abyss unlocked, and hordes of weird looking locusts emerge, with men's faces but women's hair, stinging those without God's seal.
These could only be understood by the 1st century Christian with a good knowledge of the Scriptures, and contemporary events. Locust armies, for example, were often used in scripture to picture invading armies. (Compare Nahum 3:16, and Joel 1, both of which compare invading armies to locusts.)
And we know that before the final destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD, the Idumeans and Zealots fell upon Jerusalem and tortured the remaining population that had not heeded Jesus' command to flee - they even dressed up as women.
So the 1st century Christians in Asia were being given a symbolic vision of events that were taking place in Palestine, and by chapter 12 they were given a more complete picture, showing how Satan and his angels were also involved in this period of "great tribulation".
And by chapter 13, they were helped to see how the secular power, the Roman empire, would become a tool of Satan to persecute and kill them.
So my question to all people on this forum who believe in Futuristic scenarios is... what makes you believe in those scenarios?
We see that Jesus strongly makes clear that the "great tribulation" was a one-off event, that it was foretold upon Jerusalem and upon the generation to which he preached... and yet people still want to apply this to the world in general, and in the future.
And I wrote another thread a while back which demonstrates the strong parallels between Revelation and events from the 1st century onwards, as recorded particularly in Josephus.
So then, given this great body of evidence which suggests that the bulk of the prophecies have already been fulfilled, and are not "repeatable" (either with "dual" fulfillments, or with "type/antitype" scenarios)...
... what makes YOU believe in the Futurist scenario?
(No, I don't believe Christ has been revealed from the heavens yet (as per Revelation 19), but I think the "coming on the clouds" business in the gospels is altogether a different event, and was in reference to his coming against Jerusalem - just in case people think I'm arguing Christ has come and gone, as it were.)
I was originally writing a reply to someone's post, but I thought I'd turn this into a more general discussion.
I notice that many here believe in a Futurist scenario involving a great tribulation, sun and moon darkening, an antichrist figure sitting in a rebuilt Jewish Temple and making (and then breaking) a covenant with the Jews, while the New World Order imposes its chip implants on the world... or variations on the above themes.
Most of these scenarios are built around prophetic passages such as Mathew 24, Luke 21 and most of Revelation.
The problem I have is, to me it now seems pretty clear that the bulk of those prophecies could only be fulfilled in the 1st century.
For example, Jesus said of the "great tribulation", that it would be something that had "not occurred since the world’s beginning until now, no, nor will occur again." In other words, it would be a one-off event. It could not have a type and an anti-type, or a dual fulfillment!
Furthermore, he repeatedly said that the generation to which he preached - "this generation" - was the generation to experience that wrath:
"I am sending forth to YOU prophets and wise men and public instructors. Some of them YOU will kill and impale, and some of them YOU will scourge in YOUR synagogues and persecute from city to city; that there may come upon YOU all the righteous blood spilled on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zech·a·ri´ah son of Bar·a·chi´ah, whom YOU murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. Truly I say to YOU, All these things will come upon this generation." (Mathew 23:34-36)
"... these are days for meting out justice, that all the things written may be fulfilled. Woe to the pregnant woman and the ones suckling a baby in those days! For there will be great necessity upon the land and wrath on this people..." (Luke 21:22,23)
"Truly I say to you that this generation will by no means pass away until all these things occur." (Mathew 24:34)
We know that all of the things Jesus described in Luke 21 and Mathew 24 came about before the destruction of Jerusalem...
- Wars. (In fact, the Roman empire even degenerated into civil war upon the death of Nero in 68AD).
- Famines, earthquakes - read Josephus.
- Good news preached in all inhabited earth. This was confirmed by the apostle Paul.
- Jerusalem surrounded by encamped armies. Fulfilled in 66AD.
- Christians to flee. Historically, they fled to Pella.
- Jerusalem trampled. The Romans breached Jerusalem in 70AD, and the Jewish war continued for three and a half years, until Masada was captured in 73AD.
- Jews led into captivity into all the nations. Fuifilled.
- Christ came in a cloud. This probably causes Christians the most difficulty, but we should understand that Jehovah uses this kind of language when he comes against a city. For example, compare Isaiah 66:6 and 66:15,16 to see the language Jehovah used to express his anger against those committing badness in his Temple and in Jerusalem - he would come as a fire, and a storm wind to slay the wicked in the land.
Or compare Joel 2, which describes the army of Chaldeans that God was foretelling He would bring upon the land (which he also promised he would restore and make compensation for) - which would be "a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick gloom." (Joel 2:1,2)
So if we can grasp that Christ came in the clouds upon Jerusalem in 70AD, and gave them plenty of signs, even physical ones in heaven (such as the star shaped as a cross that hung over Jerusalem before its destruction, as recorded by Josephus), then we can accept that Mathew 24 and Luke 21 have been fulfilled, because they were prophecies recorded for the 1st century Jews.
(That is not to say there is not a future revealing - there almost certainly is, as recorded in Revelation 19, which I don't believe is the same thing.)
On the other hand, Revelation was written to 7 congregations in Asia, and were recorded for their benefit.
I won't go into all the evidence here, but I believe it points to it having been written during Nero's reign, sometime in the 60's of the 1st century (Nero started persecuting Christians from 62AD, but died in 68AD, so this is the most likely window for its authorship), but before the destruction of Jerusalem.
Revelation uses symbolic language to describe events leading up to and including the fall of Jerusalem, in chapters 6 to 11 - so that the 1st century Christians could understand the relevance of Jerusalem's fall to God's overall plan - and so that they could understand the connections with the Old Testament prophets.
So, for example, in the "fifth trumpet", John sees the abyss unlocked, and hordes of weird looking locusts emerge, with men's faces but women's hair, stinging those without God's seal.
These could only be understood by the 1st century Christian with a good knowledge of the Scriptures, and contemporary events. Locust armies, for example, were often used in scripture to picture invading armies. (Compare Nahum 3:16, and Joel 1, both of which compare invading armies to locusts.)
And we know that before the final destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD, the Idumeans and Zealots fell upon Jerusalem and tortured the remaining population that had not heeded Jesus' command to flee - they even dressed up as women.
So the 1st century Christians in Asia were being given a symbolic vision of events that were taking place in Palestine, and by chapter 12 they were given a more complete picture, showing how Satan and his angels were also involved in this period of "great tribulation".
And by chapter 13, they were helped to see how the secular power, the Roman empire, would become a tool of Satan to persecute and kill them.
So my question to all people on this forum who believe in Futuristic scenarios is... what makes you believe in those scenarios?
We see that Jesus strongly makes clear that the "great tribulation" was a one-off event, that it was foretold upon Jerusalem and upon the generation to which he preached... and yet people still want to apply this to the world in general, and in the future.
And I wrote another thread a while back which demonstrates the strong parallels between Revelation and events from the 1st century onwards, as recorded particularly in Josephus.
So then, given this great body of evidence which suggests that the bulk of the prophecies have already been fulfilled, and are not "repeatable" (either with "dual" fulfillments, or with "type/antitype" scenarios)...
... what makes YOU believe in the Futurist scenario?
(No, I don't believe Christ has been revealed from the heavens yet (as per Revelation 19), but I think the "coming on the clouds" business in the gospels is altogether a different event, and was in reference to his coming against Jerusalem - just in case people think I'm arguing Christ has come and gone, as it were.)