Paradise Café Discussions A Place For Bible Research And Christian Encouragement

Full Version: Firpo Carr (JW PhD) Says Black Men Bigger
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
http://firpocarr.com/_wsn/page5.html


The Bible and Black Male Sexuality
(Does Size Really Matter?)
By Firpo W. Carr, Ph.D.
Los Angeles Sentinel Newspaper
(October 25 - 31, 2007)
It has been rumored from time immemorial that when it comes to genitalia, Black men are generally more endowed than are men of other races. The behavior (or more accurately, misbehavior) of some White slave owners would suggest the veracity of such a conclusion given that, being insanely jealous of them, White slave owners not only brutalized or killed generously endowed male slaves they didn’t like, they also castrated them. The wives of these slave owners, as well as other female friends and relatives, didn’t help matters by craving the sexual attention of slave men.
To this very day there are tales among White women, Black women, Asian women, Latinas and others that “once you’ve had Black, you never go back.” In plain English, they’re saying that once you’ve been with a well-endowed Black man, it’s highly unlikely that you’d ever be sexually satisfied in the same way by a man of another race.
Intriguingly, this thought is not a new one. The Bible notes that ancient women of Israel and Judah who were of easy virtue shared the same sentiments as do their 21st-century counterparts. In fact, several religiously diverse translations of the Bible bare this out. All are popular conservative versions that are at the same time literal translations. Note how they render a very revealing verse found in the book of Ezekiel.
(1) “And you went prostituting yourself to the sons of Egypt, your neighbors great of flesh, and you continued making your prostitution abound in order to offend me.” (Ezekiel 16:26; New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures) In committing spiritual adultery the nation of Israel, considered by Jehovah to be his symbolic wife, worshiped idol gods and trusted in foreign nations instead of her Husbandly Owner. The symbolisms were reality based. Therefore, “the sons of Egypt” (or, Africans) were literally “great of flesh.” A footnote in the New World Translation says this refers to “the genital organ.” Bluntly stated, it literally translates into this clause: ‘the African who has a great-sized genital organ.’ Yes, Black Africans had such a reputation of sexual prowess that God saw to it that Ezekiel, under inspiration, documented this fact as an aside. Other versions of the Bible also have rather illuminating translations.
(2) “You have played the harlot with your neighbors, the sensual Egyptians; over and over you have done it.” (Ezekiel 16:26; The Bible: A New Translation, by James Moffatt) This Protestant translation leaves no doubt that African men were indeed “sensual.” Insofar as sex with these super “sensual” Black men was concerned, Jewish women were told by God, “over and over you have done it” with the Africans. A somewhat graphic description of this scenario is not confined to the two Protestant translations above.
(3) “You have lain down for those big-membered neighbors, the Egyptians” says The Jerusalem Bible at Ezekiel 16:26. This well-known Catholic translation leaves little to the imagination. Again, these Black Africans from Egypt were “big-membered” when compared to men of other races. The Israelite women knew this all too well for they had “lain down” with them. Be that as it may, it gets even more interesting.
According to this same translation, The Jerusalem Bible, Ezekiel 23:3 exposes Jewish women saying that it was in Africa that “their nipples were handled…[and that] their virgin breast were first fondled” by Black men. (I’m guessing they didn’t teach you this in Sunday school….Just a guess.) And to top things off, the New World Translation renders Ezekiel 23:19, 20 as follows: “And she kept multiplying her acts of prostitution to the point of calling to mind the days of her youth, when she prostituted herself in the land of Egypt. And she kept lusting in the style of concubines belonging to those whose fleshly member is as the fleshly member of male asses and whose genital organ is as the genital organ of male horses.” All-righty-then!
The New English Bible, another Protestant translation, is even more descriptive. It says of symbolic Jerusalem: “She was infatuated with their [Black] male prostitutes, whose members were like those of asses and whose seed came in floods like that of horses.” (Ezekiel 23:20) All-righty-then! Not to be outdone, the Catholic Jerusalem Bible translates this text as follows: “She had been infatuated by profligates big-membered as donkeys, ejaculating as violently as stallions.” (Ezekiel 23:20) (My eyes dun seen da gloray of da comin’ of da Lawd!) Okaaaaay.
Well, I think we get the point. Apparently when it comes to genitalia, all men are not created equal. So, does size really matter? To some women it does. However, I like to think that to the more spiritual ones true love matters more. After all, how many Black women have encountered Black men who were great in bed, but who were woefully lacking in other areas? Whatever the case, the Bible isn’t prudish on matters of sex. So, the next time you hear someone say that Black men have it going on in the bedroom, surprise them by saying, “You know, that’s in the Bible baby!” …Amen.

http://stirinc.org/home.html
Yea but how many other races did the Israelite woman have access to, like the Nordic and Germanic races for example?
Also too, the main difference in genitalia was that the Israelite men were deliberately truncated!!.....Help
Silly but honest question. Are the "Egyptions" "Black"?

Although I am quite sure that there are "Black" Egyptians, all the Egyptions I have known personally (substantial) are not what I would consider "Black."

I believe that the "Nubians" are "Black", but the Egyptians were more of Arabic extraction, today and then.

He will gain control of the treasures of gold and silver and all the riches of Egypt, with the Libyans and Nubians in submission. - Dan 11:43

It seems strange that this topic should even be brought up by him though. Or maybe not. Thinking

Quote:
Silly but honest question. Are the "Egyptions" "Black"?

Although I am quite sure that there are "Black" Egyptians, all the Egyptions I have known personally (substantial) are not what I would consider "Black."


Two of my flatmates back in London were Egyptians. Both, as well as all of their Egyptian friends had this classic Mediterranean look I would say. I imagine the coastal location brought a variety of shades to life as time progressed.

Gasp!


But the question on everyone's mind is....






"Should I buy a Hyundai?"


gus

e-magine Wrote:
...... Israelite men were deliberately truncated!!.....Help


Even today some ("non-israelite") boys are "truncated" - deliberately! My father-in-law had both of his sons circumcised. When I asked my husband why he did that he answered that his father (a physician) told him that it is more hygienic. Makes sense to me.

Can I think about an A4 instead?

Bruny Wrote:

e-magine Wrote:
...... Israelite men were deliberately truncated!!.....Help


Even today some ("non-israelite") boys are "truncated" - deliberately! My father-in-law had both of his sons circumcised. When I asked my husband why he did that he answered that his father (a physician) told him that it is more hygienic. Makes sense to me.

Can I think about an A4 instead?




Main Entry: truncated
Function: adjective
Date: circa 1704

1: having the apex replaced by a plane section and especially by one parallel to the base <a truncated cone>2 a: cut short : curtailed <a truncated schedule> b: lacking an expected or normal element (as a syllable) at the beginning or end : catalectic


SAY WHAT?

Them is fightin' words!!!


Is there somethin' I'm missin' here?

gus

Is there somethin' I'm missin' here?

Not sure Gus!

It would appear that the definition that you found is not conclusive!

Truncation can mean:
to circumcise
to shorten
to trim
RE: "Is there somethin' I'm missin' here?"

I'dunno. You tell me.

gogh Wrote:
I'dunno. You tell me.


Tell you what?

gus

Sigmund Freud was transfixed by sexual matters.
The fact that he did more cocaine than all of Brixton, and its squirrels* is another matter.

Mr. Freud thought that the size of ones nose might be directly related to the size of ones penis and went around measuring (those who would allow) the relative members of his friends with calipers.........along with his relative's members to prove his theory.
Thank God my family are not related.

Mr. Freud was of Jewish extraction and did not have a small snozzle so perhaps he had something he wanted to prove, which Edwardian society would not allow him to flaunt.

Anyway, whether a male is of Semitic Jewish extraction or black Hamitic, has a big nose or large feet..... is irrelevent.
Speaking personally, as a female, the size of those funny looking small dangly bits is not what attracts an intelligent women to a man: Try instead, conversation, empathy, and wit and dare I say it.....love, sensitivity and....oops have to stop here.
A large Jewish black man with a big nose, enormous feet but no conversation would not do it for me!

I could go into more details but had better behave.

love vicky

ps. you guys, don't ever get a complex, size means nothing.

pps. circumcision, though totally unnecessary (except for phimosis) should never trunkate the penis.

ppps.. Egyptians were Hamitic, black, had curly hair, shaved it all and wore wigs. Later, when Alexander conquered Egypt, the rulers became decendants of Ptolemy, a Greek; Cleopatra according to her image on a coin, had the large Ptolemy nose.

* the drug dealers in Brixton, south London, hide their stash in their gardens, and squirrels have been digging them up and getting hooked on crack.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHzdsFiBbFc
As a Black Woman who used to be married to a Black Man..........I have to disagree with that old saying. I truly do believe that it has to do with genetics more than race but then again what do I know I married the only man that I ever knew and when we divorced he was still the only man I ever knew......so I can't really speak on it personally but just from reading.
L.J. you are one sweet woman.

As a care worker I have washed many bodies and they are all different.
What is more important is the soul of the person, not their shape, colour or even at that age, their mind. It is their disposition, as I said their soul that matters.

Love vicky
Thank you Vicky;

You are absolutely right. It is what is on the inside that matters more than anything else. Love comes from within ones soul that from the heart no matter how tall, how short, curvy or not curvy. Is all about love and the heart HugHugHug.

man hu Wrote:
L.J. you are one sweet woman.

As a care worker I have washed many bodies and they are all different.
What is more important is the soul of the person, not their shape, colour or even at that age, their mind. It is their disposition, as I said their soul that matters.

Love vicky

With nice people like we have on the board the elephant man would have indeed been married in no time.

Research shows mind you that it is the length of the fingers that is the best guide to what a man might have to offer physically. Apparently this is due to the fact that the same genes that determine finger length also determine the length of what a man has down below and I don’t mean possums. What the length of ladies fingers might indicate we can only speculate but I bet it isn’t how well they can do the washing up with fairy liquid.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's