Paradise Cafe Discussions - A Place For Bible Research And Christian Encouragement

Full Version: Believers 'Put Their Child's Life In Danger'
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Believers 'Put Their Child's Life In Danger'.

Tania Broughton
September 20 2007 at 03:16PM

http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_i...770C937079

Lawyers acting for a Durban hospital and paediatric surgeon made a mercy dash to the High Court this week, securing a court order allowing them to give a critically ill two-year-old girl a blood transfusion in the face of staunch opposition from her Jehovah's Witness parents.

In granting the order giving Parklands Hospital and surgeon Abdool Shaik authority to do whatever is necessary over the next seven days to save the little girl's life, Durban High Court Judge Herbert Msimang said the court, as the upper guardian of all children, had to act in their best interests.

The parents, Thabani and Simangele Mabanga, who were supported in court by members of their church, had argued earlier that God was the ultimate guardian, and that according to their religious beliefs they would not give consent for a transfusion.


Their daughter was admitted to hospital at the end of August suffering from pneumonia. She was diagnosed with a massive sub-hepatic abscess in her abdominal cavity and was referred to Shaik for surgery.

In his affidavit before the judge, Shaik said she was critically ill - "in the early stages of cardiac arrest" - and in urgent need of abdominal surgery and a blood transfusion to enable the surgery to be performed.

Because of the nature of the surgery, she would lose a considerable amount of blood.

"This will be compensated by the giving of a blood transfusion prior to and possibly after surgery. It is my opinion, and the opinion of the anaesthetist, that in the absence of this, the child is unlikely to survive surgery."

This had been explained to the parents, but they had declined to authorise the blood transfusions "as it is contrary to the tenets of their faith".

On Monday the parents had indicated that if emergency surgery was required, and all efforts to avoid a blood transfusion had failed, and Shaik regarded it as vital to save her life, then the transfusion could be done.

But they changed their minds and withdrew this "conditional authority".

"I am now concerned that the parents might withdraw their consent to the life-saving surgery as well," Shaik said.

The parents suggested during Tuesday's court hearing that the doctor should consider using a synthesised protein product that reportedly helps to oxygenate the blood.

But they only handed in pamphlets on the product and had no medical evidence to back them up. It was also suggested that the product had not been registered for use on small children in South Africa.

Advocates acting for the hospital and the doctor said they respected the parents' right to their religious beliefs but that that had to be weighed against the constitutional right to life. They referred to a similar case in Johannesburg in 2003 in which the court had granted a similar order.

Approached by The Mercury on Wednesday, Gillian Williams, of MacRobert, the firm representing the doctor, said the little girl was being operated on on Wednesday and would be transfused during and, if necessary, after the surgery.

Warm Christian Love
Bangalore

Bangalore Wrote:
This had been explained to the parents, but they had declined to authorise the blood transfusions "as it is contrary to the tenets of their faith".

On Monday the parents had indicated that if emergency surgery was required, and all efforts to avoid a blood transfusion had failed, and Shaik regarded it as vital to save her life, then the transfusion could be done.

But they changed their minds and withdrew this "conditional authority".


It looks as if those 11th-hour "supporters" managed to convince the folks to ignore their God-given parental nature and the sanctity of life in favor of a wonderful religious tradition...and we know what Jesus thought of religious tradition. I applaud the doc for going above and beyond to do what he thinks is the right thing. If there's any hope for mankind, we know where not to find it...as they line up defenseless children for sacrifice to the great tower god of Brooklyn, NY.

gus

gus Wrote:

Bangalore Wrote:
This had been explained to the parents, but they had declined to authorise the blood transfusions "as it is contrary to the tenets of their faith".

On Monday the parents had indicated that if emergency surgery was required, and all efforts to avoid a blood transfusion had failed, and Shaik regarded it as vital to save her life, then the transfusion could be done.

But they changed their minds and withdrew this "conditional authority".


It looks as if those 11th-hour "supporters" managed to convince the folks to ignore their God-given parental nature and the sanctity of life in favor of a wonderful religious tradition...and we know what Jesus thought of religious tradition. I applaud the doc for going above and beyond to do what he thinks is the right thing. If there's any hope for mankind, we know where not to find it...as they line up defenseless children for sacrifice to the great tower god of Brooklyn, NY.

gus


You said it man! :readthis:

13 "You shall not murder." (Ex 20, NIV)

_______________

29 Oh, that their hearts would be inclined to fear me and keep all my commands always, so that it might go well with them and their children forever! (Deut 5, NIV)

_______________

3Jesus replied, "And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition?

7You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:
8" 'These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
9They worship me in vain;
their teachings are but rules taught by men.' "

10Jesus called the crowd to him and said, "Listen and understand. 11What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.' "

12Then the disciples came to him and asked, "Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?"

13He replied, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. 14Leave them; they are blind guides. If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit." (Mt 15, NIV, italics mine)

_______________

13"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men's faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to.

15"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are. (Mt 23, NIV)


gus
Reference URL's