First of all, it sickens me to see a headline that says "Jehovah paedo". I hope the warlocks in the Witchtower are happy that their policy leads to this kind of reproach on Jehovah's name.
Second of all, how fast would his wife and the Society dump him if he questioned the 1914 divination? But no, child abuse, even infant abuse is "ok", because those sleazebag sluts in the Artemis/Semiramis Fortress Tower have a "holy" book that says it's ok, the Babylonian Talmud.
Jesh
I think it starts before that. What of the man who confuses submission to Christ with submission to a corporate beast whilst convincing himself that he's shepherd of family or flock? Jesus never commanded a man to check his important male parts at the KH door. On the contrary and by his own example, he showed men how to be real men. Actually, none of this surprises me in the least. There will always be males who play-act a man's role...and the women who enable them.

gus
and the man explained it by saying he misunderstood a father's day card she had given him telling him she ''loved'' him. In his warped brain he thought this 'love' was of the romantic nature and in her warped brain she bought it--the mother that is. The girl sobbed through the whole thing and the step-father was defensive and non -apoligetic--the mother was cold to the daughter and held the hand of her husband.The judge did what he could and for my part--I was sickened by the whole thing--including the attorney defending him also blaming the child....there's no words--it's just so sick

I remember years back a Mormon family studying with a couple in our congregation. They had 9 or so kids. The oldest daughter was a step-daughter to the father. She was about 14. I and another older teen studied with her.
One day all shock hit the fan as it was found out this step-father had been taking the oldest girl to hotel rooms and watching porn with her and molesting her.
The step-father cried forgive me....the mother stayed with him, and many of us were sickened by it but could say nothing...."the elders were handling it", and he wasn't a baptized brother.
They continued to come to meetings and were in my bookstudy....I remember watching him and having a gut feeling that that slimebag was still molesting....but this time with one of his own younger daughters. He was so attentive with Desiree, she was about 2, he obviously favored her and doted on her, was always holding her. And right after bookstudy was over he would take the sleeping child out to the car and wait for his wife who spent time socializing inside the house. He gave me the creeps, and made me sad and mad at the whole thing.
They had a child every year, so there was a 3 year old girl, a nursing baby, a 4 year old boy etc. He would leave them all in the house with the mother and right away would go out to the car with Desiree.
The older daughter is messed up. on drugs and obviously has issues with the fact that her mother didn't leave her husband...just because he cried "I'm sorry"......
oy
I think this goes well beyond religious beliefs. The vast majority of women married to men they subsequently discover to be child abusers never leave their husbands.
I was in a class that dealt with this specific issue. Psychologist know from interviewing these 'men' that, while having sex, they frequently fantasize that their wife is a prior victim...a small boy or girl.
Even when these women are given this disgusting information by detectives, they usually choose to stay.
The women who marry these men are often as ill as the men themselves, just in different ways. And they do tend to attract each other!
Justicia
un-empathetic judges 

makes me wonder, that's for sure
) should be sentenced along with the culprits, if they continue to support and ubhold their abhorrant behaviour.They are all likewise sickos! What mercy they dish out, will likewise be dished out to them.
How much we are in need of God and His kingdom promises.
Agape,
Sis Grateful
I believe men should have an innate desire to protect their wives and children, similarly wives/mothers should be naturally protective of their children.
Abused individuals lose these natural instincts.
Medics would not normally allow massively infected individuals to look after the young and vulnerable, yet that is what happens morally. The mentally ill are allowed to give birth to the most vulnerable and raise them.
The weak human idea of 'headship' is a load of rot!
Before anyone takes on the role, they should be willing to stand up, be counted, and firstly have control of themselves.
Bowing to the headship of an animal, makes you even less than an animal.
Well rant over (for now),
love vicky