Paradise Cafe Discussions - A Place For Bible Research And Christian Encouragement

Full Version: Back at it...
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
http://www.e-watchman.co.uk/

Robert's latest blog.

excerpt:
In order to achieve world domination the United States is intent on launching a pre-emptive strike on Russia’s underground and undersea nuclear facilities. The missile shield that is being installed in Poland and the Czech Republic is for the purpose of taking out any stray nuclear missiles that may be launched in the wake of the planned pre-emptive strike. Knocking out their only legitimate nuclear rival would leave London’s dumb giant, the United States, in the position to dictate terms to the rest of the world, which, of course, is exactly what the prophecies foretell the last king will do.

In 2004 the American administration adopted Conplan 8022, known as Global Strike. The implementation of Global Strike has essentially cocked the trigger and readied America’s vast nuclear strike capability to be launched against pre-selected “high value targets” in numerous nations on a moment’s notice – this without congressional approval. (Anyone interested in the presently developing situation ought to read William Engdahl’s article on Putin and the Geopolitics of the New Cold War.)

With American military bases virtually surrounding Russia, evidently a pretext for war is all that remains before the United States unleashes Global Strike.


Anyone see any of the multitude of problems with this scenario (other than the fact that he apparently pulls it out of thin air)?

gus
Well, I think the fact that he pulls it out of thin air is a good start Gus. Is he saying American is about to nuke Russia?
a quote:

"...the United States, in the position to dictate terms to the rest of the world, which, of course, is exactly what the prophecies foretell the last king will do."

Is the United States the Last king?

Why do I not care?
I dunno, Robert has been foretelling the world collapse for years now. I even saw a dialog between him and the JWD board from several years ago where he specifically predicted the financial collapse of America by a certain date, and of coarse the date went by just like any other day.

I am not saying people shouldn't be cautious. But all this fear mongering in the name of God, and date setting has gotten Christianity absolutely nowhere in the past 2000 years.
sounds like the old school w.t fear tactics to me...............
i mean even if there was a shred of truth in it.............Jehovah has everything in hand, so why be overly concerned, just trust in him, and chillout, is my motto.......................of course i might be a little too laid back for some ppl.............. (Jesus said "keep your eye ( to me this means life too) simple" ) yet they keep trying to fathom the unfathomable, we don`t know when the end is........... neither did Christ...........so ..........(and this is just a wild stab in the dark)lol........... maybe we just arent supposed to know!!???!!!


much love as always
dissnchntd1 ;)
Philippians 4:4...

"Always rejoice in [the] Lord. Once more I will say, Rejoice! Let YOUR reasonableness become known to all men. The Lord is near. Do not be anxious over anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication along with thanksgiving let YOUR petitions be made known to God; and the peace of God that excels all thought will guard YOUR hearts and YOUR mental powers by means of Christ Jesus."
I assume this occurs after Iran has been nuked? :shocked: :(

(This was mentioned previously, wasn’t it?) :confused::thinking:

Measurer. :hibye:
Yep.  Iran is next.  I don't know about "nuked", yet, but they are next.

:shocked:

prop---if everyone is paranoid except you, gus, why can't we hear your voice on skype?---min

the only thing about which i am incredulous is the fact than anyone even takes the time to bother with what e-dub says. his credibility is far less than zero, imho. (not to mention the noticeable absence of any significant display of a Christ-like new personality, fruitage of the holy spirit, and all o' that good stuff.) :dontknow:

he continues to talk about all of the wrong things, and to send people down all of the wrong trails.

again, that is only mho, of course.

iso...

e-W board is great for the latest illuminati updates...:whistle:...

His "stuff" is good for breaking down the WT....

He also shuts up the kingdom for others with his doggedly clinging to 144,000, "annointed remnant", "gods organization" garbage.

Like most else; some 'ok', other is 'rubbish'.

He also "disfellowships" you if you don't agree with him and say so...:cry:

:cheer:

prop---"everybody's got something to hide except for me and my monkey"---min
My youngest daughter is in D.C. right now, interning for the Director of Pacific Northwest National Laboratories at the D.C. office. They are a sub-contractor for the DOE. She works in their Homeland Security Directorate.

Her specialty is Nuclear Nonproliferation. Specifically, she is working on this project: http://www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/russia/fo...e/mpca.htm

She is only 21 years old, however, she has extremely high security clearance, and just day before yesterday she was in a five hour "planning meeting" with NNSA officials over a map of Russia and its top-secret weapons-grade nuclear storage facilities. She is slated to leave soon for Balarus to "help" them with their security.

I'm going to forward Robert's ideas for her response. ;) She'll love this!

She can not and does not discuss her work, but I really doubt Robert's scenario.

Justicia
Hi Gus

Re: "..problems with this scenario..."

The scenario is not very important,imo. Robert Kings perception seems to be faulty.


A quote from Robert:

"What gives me the creeps is how some people have the capacity to pretend to be your friend, all the while hating you."

Did not many here befriend Robert King through his trials?

Yet, without hesitation, boot the majority of his (discussion board) friends?....(Discussion board friends are human too, Robert.)

Pray for Robert King.

gogh

Justicia Wrote:
My youngest daughter is in D.C. right now, interning for the Director of Pacific Northwest National Laboratories at the D.C. office. They are a sub-contractor for the DOE. She works in their Homeland Security Directorate.

Her specialty is Nuclear Nonproliferation. Specifically, she is working on this project: http://www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/russia/fo...e/mpca.htm

She is only 21 years old, however, she has extremely high security clearance, and just day before yesterday she was in a five hour "planning meeting" with NNSA officials over a map of Russia and its top-secret weapons-grade nuclear storage facilities. She is slated to leave soon for Balarus to "help" them with their security.

I'm going to forward Robert's ideas for her response. ;) She'll love this!

She can not and does not discuss her work, but I really doubt Robert's scenario.

Justicia



Sweet job, Justicia! That's the kind of internship that makes a resume pretty attractive. There is little doubt that the dissolution of the SU into nation-states is fraught with problems. Imagine the US breaking apart into 50 self-governed nuclear-powers! She's got a good job, Justicia, because possession of nuclear materials by people of unknown or unpredictable motivations is everyone's problem. I'd be interested in her take on Robert's blog (if she is able to stop laughing, that is).

Gogh,
That was the scenario I was referring to: the big picture one. How strong is one's faith when one actually believes that Jehovah would allow for a literal global conflagration...and then uses that rationale to attempt to influence others (with some success I might add...just check his board)? Sis Diss makes a good point: fear-based worship isn't really worship whether it's hellfire, disfellow-whipping, or global incineration. It's dysfunctional, co-dependent, man-created nonsense that demonstrates nothing but a complete lack of faith. And we should listen to such people? When I see people with such ability use their resources to project their own insecurities it makes me sick to my stomach.

gus

gus Wrote:
She's got a good job, Justicia, because possession of nuclear materials by people of unknown or unpredictable motivations is everyone's problem. I'd be interested in her take on Robert's blog (if she is able to stop laughing, that is).

gus


So, I will TRY to capuslate her response; it is HER forte, not mine, so sometimes, I just do not understand fully what she is saying.  What is interesting, it that she received my email while in a meeting discussing this very issue.  She planned on taking Friday off; however, she was called in specifically to attend this meeting with representative of the DOE, NNSA, and others who deal with second-line-of-defense issues.  MPCA is a first-line issue...stopping people from getting nuclear material.  Others deal with second-line issues...once someone has it, how can it be kept "in country".  How can it be ensured that they are stopped at a border or port.

So, here goes...  Apparently, this issue revolves around START and the ABM treaty.  Bush pulled the US out of both agreements.  The ABM treaty, which is a bilateral agreement between the US and Russia, limited each country to two anti-ballistic missle launch sources.  The US had one in Washington, D.C. and one in North Dakota.  Bush pulled out because he wanted a "national" system.

Now that he has established the national system, he is going farther and is establishing the two sites that Robert mentions.  I asked her specifically if these sites could be changed from a defensive mode to an offensive mode, i.e., instead of using these site to shoot down Russia's missles, could their usage be change to one that shoots IBMs.  Her response was that anything and eveything can be changed.

However, the meeting she was participating in was to discuss 2009 (I think she said 2009; it might be 2008) and coming to an agreement with Russia.

Right now, Russia views Bush as an agressor, and Bush views Putin as tyrannical.  Groups within the government are meeting to decide what they will recommend to the President, whoever that may be, on a future course.  The questions they dealt with Friday were: It is best to just extend START?  If so, at what level?  Right now, she thought that Russia was limited to 1000 ICBMs and the US to 1500 ICBMs; however, to destroy the world, what do you need...5?  3?

So her team is in the process of developing their official recommendation.  They decided to throw their vote away by presenting an artifically low recommendation of each country committing to "only" 600 IBMs.  THIS NUMBER IS A NON-STARTER, , and they know that.  They are trying to get the powers-that-be used to dealing with smaller numbers.  

Next week, they will address such issues as...How do they want to create an agreement?  Is extending START the best idea?  Perhaps getting a UN resolution is a better idea?  And, how to monitor this agreement?  Do you need UN inspectors?  Perhaps an unformal treaty is better.  While it lacks teeth, it is a starting point for both countries.  And, do they want to limit it to both countries?  As Gus mentioned, this is a BIG problem that affects everyone.  

Should they take this out of the bi-lateral nature of the US and Russia and try to seek agreement of other countries which represent an even greater risk, such as Moldavia, Kosovo, Georgia and Iran?  

They have identified at least eight options on agreements alone that they will be further defining in their recommendations.

Her job deals with MPCA.  Obviously, she would like to see less nuclear material, because less of it makes it easier to secure and track.

As for Robert's assessment, obviously nothing is outside the realm of possibility, and who knows what we will see before Armageddon.  However, Gus was right...she laughed at the whole concept.

And Gus, you again are correct, it is a great job and resume builder.  She is, however, very lonely.  Often, she is the only female in a room filled with very powerful elderly men.  For the first time, I actually felt sorry for Condolezza Rice when I saw pictures of her a Sharmel Sheik (spelling?), as she was the lone female in a room filled with men, AND she was the lone African American.  

My daughter said she has no counterparts.  All the women she meets are in support positions, so she doesn't really have dealings with them except to ask for things.  Also, she said that DC is pretty much that way; her guess was that is is about 70/30 men to women.  

But, she is tough; she'll  get through it.  She had one meeting where several men were very "condescending."   She said she mentally "took pictures of their faces" so that she remembers them "when she gets back to DC again."  Pray for them!

Justicia  

Thanks, Justicia. I know that there still exists some of that old fashion "chivalry" in DC (and other places) where women are not taken seriously. But if your daughter is patient, she can make inroads into areas where testosterone presents a subconscious threat. I think that's why Condoleeza is relatively successful.

I think that MAD (mutually assured destruction) kept everyone alive from the 60s to '91. With the downfall of the SU, however, nuclear materials were available "on the market" (black or otherwise)...and who knows who possesses them now? Delivery systems...now that's another thing altogether. But all one needs is a visa and a briefcase to deliver a dirty bomb. Preventing that kind of stuff is more my cup of tea.

Lots of potential, Justicia! It might take a few years; but I wish I'd had that opportunity when I was 21! Tell her to keep at it.

gus
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Reference URL's